User talk:96.61.17.68

January 2019
Hello, I'm Girth Summit. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Egalitarianism seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 18:10, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Egalitarianism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop blanking at Egalitarianism
You need to stop deleting sourced material - I also wasn't satisfied with the way it was written which is why I rewrote it. Islam started with radical ideas but like too many revolutions they fell back to the old unequal ways. I plan to rewrite the Judaism section also. You aren't helping to improve the article by deleting. You do some research and bring it to the talk page. Continuing to delete will get you blocked. Doug Weller talk 20:06, 25 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Noy my talk page, the article talk page. Egalitarianism and religion is a very notable subject and there's no chance it will be deleted. Doug Weller  talk 20:26, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as done at Egalitarianism. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 20:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.