User talk:96.63.15.43

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Firearm, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=499831234 here].  J (t)  23:51, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Firearm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=499831501 here].  J (t)  23:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Firearm, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=499831613 here].  J (t)  23:54, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Firearm shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You've made the same edit 6 times now. Give it up. Meters (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thats 8 times today for the same edit, and 10 times in all. Discuss or be blocked. Meters (talk) 00:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Firearm
The name firearm comes from "fire" and "armament" - armament being a WEAPON. Your "baseball bat" argument is good, except that the bat is primarily designed for playing baseball, and firearms are primarily designed as WEAPONS. Sure, you can use it as an "instrument" to open a beer with or whatever, but do you really think Smith & Wesson (or any other manufacturer) would make that a primary purpose? Why do you think firearms were invented in the first place? If you are really concerned about this, debate it on the article's "Talk" page and stop edit-warring. yes hello, nprice (was) here. (talk) 00:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk with me
On the page Talk:Firearm. Why is it an instrument? -- J (t)  00:02, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kuru  (talk)  00:25, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nackawic was changed by 96.63.15.43 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936344 on 2012-11-22T12:21:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)