User talk:96.67.178.233

May 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arctic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 19:51, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2023
Hello! I'm Gatemansgc. Your recent edit(s) to the page David Brainerd appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 18:57, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Jars of Clay have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 18:11, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm Filmssssssssssss. I noticed that you recently removed content from 1914 in science without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 1914 in science, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 16:00, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 1914 in science, you may be blocked from editing. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 16:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, I'm Jacona. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dale Brown (basketball)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jacona (talk) 20:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Gordon Korman. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 20:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Renewal6. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Laos have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Renewal6 (talk) 20:26, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Laos. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DB 1729 talk 20:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Laos, you may be blocked from editing. Samf4u (talk) 20:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Laos.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Online ) 20:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2024
Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Wesley—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 20:35, 22 February 2024 (UTC)