User talk:96 248 l5 44

August 2013
Hello, I'm Andrewman327. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Shake Weight because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Andrew327 16:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shake Weight. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Shake Weight was changed by 96 248 l5 44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8518 on 2013-08-20T16:15:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Do not use multiple accounts to vandalize Wikipedia. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 16:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:18, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shake Weight, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Andrew327 16:26, 20 August 2013 (UTC)