User talk:96hixjoh01

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place   on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dr Debug (Talk) 17:56, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Shallow Be Thy Game PROD
Hi there. I've added the "prod" template to the article Shallow Be Thy Game, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the article (also see What Wikipedia is not, Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues I've raised at Talk:Shallow Be Thy Game or in the "prod" template. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Cymsdale 11:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles for individual songs
I've noticed that you're creating articles for individual songs off of albums. Have you read WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs? I personally believe that songs don't merit an individual article (if they've been covered on an album page) unless they're otherwise notable (i.e., charted single, particularly culturally relevant, etc.). Perhaps the articles on individual songs would be better served as redirects to an expanded article on the albums from which they came?

Anyway, that's just my opinion...if you have any thoughts on the matter, you should share them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Notability and Music Guidelines/Songs. Thanks, Scientizzle 09:02, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Typo redirect -.---...
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on -.---..., by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because -.---... is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting -.---..., please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of -.---...
A tag has been placed on -.---..., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:05, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of I Could Have Lied
I have nominated I Could Have Lied, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/I Could Have Lied. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 05:14, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Lieutenant Frank Drebin
I have nominated Lieutenant Frank Drebin, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Lieutenant Frank Drebin. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – Dream out loud (talk) 22:51, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Me and My Friends for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Me and My Friends is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Me and My Friends until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  scope_creep Talk  00:04, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hollywood (Africa) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hollywood (Africa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hollywood (Africa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – DarkGlow • 19:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)