User talk:97.102.205.16

April 2024
Hello, I'm Callanecc. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I cited the earliest scriptural sources from which the Buddhist policies of surrogacy would be derived, translated into English by one of the most respected translators, who is a Buddhist monk specialising in early Buddhist studies. There is no more authoritative source. I find Wikipedia editors' frequent practice of allowing only Western academic sources, especially for subjects outside of the Western world (like Asian religions), to be very biased and colonialistic. 97.102.205.16 (talk) 14:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Piscili. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Surrogacy have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Piscili (talk) 12:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)


 * If I were a Buddhist person (which I am) considering surrogacy, I would consider the edits I made to be highly constructive (ie, helpful) in making the decision. I disagree with you, and I ask you to explain in what way you think they were not constructive. 97.102.205.16 (talk) 14:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, Wikipedia is supposed to be a place where all views are represented, not only your views. You should not try to change Buddhism to say what you want it to say. 97.102.205.16 (talk) 18:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)