User talk:97.112.207.221

Unblock request

 * You didn't have this "aw, shucks... I just wanna be a good guy making good edits" attitude when you posted this unblock request on another account, only a matter of hours ago. That, right after another daily bout of evasion, harrassment & disruption using the various IPs at your disposal. This is in keeping with your threat to continue stalking and I, to somehow force us to give in to your edit demands. I'm sure in one of your blocks an admin suggested the 6 month offer, and if not, it'll probably come up sooner or later. You should consider it. (jmho) -  w o lf  07:06, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Or, hear me out, you could just leave my very valid edits TF alone and we can all go about our business and save tons of time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.112.207.221 (talk) 12:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request three
97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

WP:GAB explains how to craft an unblock request. The one above is inappropriate, too. You'll lose access to your talk page if you continue like this. --Yamla (talk) 13:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't see how it was inappropriate. I explained exactly what I'm blocked for.  You just don't like it.
 * I'm blocked because of bias and spite. I'm not going to sit here and lie and pretend it's because of anything I did wrong. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You should make the unblock request from your original account. You should refrain from making personal attacks. You should talk about yourself, not about others; see WP:NOTTHEM. If instead you believe the blocking admin has seriously violated policy, as you are alleging, WP:ARBCOM is where you should take your grievance. I'll warn you that they are likely to dismiss it out of hand. My point, though, is that there's nothing we unblock reviewers would be able to do to, for example, desysop an admin. --Yamla (talk) 13:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how to talk about myself in an unblock request when all I've done is make valid edits and end up blocked for them. I've done literally zero wrong here, and keep getting banned for making constructive edits. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I mean I guess I'll just lie in my next unblock request so we can move past all this nonsense. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe the earlier claim that you are . The rest of this statement assumes that is the case; if it isn't, the rest of this statement should be discarded. Perhaps you are not aware that blocks apply to the person, not just the account. Until you successfully contest the block on your original account, you (you personally) are not welcome to edit Wikipedia. I want to be very clear, it doesn't matter if you edit while signed in to a new account or edit without signing in to an account. You personally are not permitted to edit. That's even aside from your violations of WP:EW. --Yamla (talk) 13:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah... About that... 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:44, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Come join my Discord server, this format kind of sucks
 * https://discord.gg/Fk7QJMrQqu 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No. I loathe discord and in any case, have no interest in communicating with you off-wiki, I'm afraid. --Yamla (talk) 13:48, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Well that doesn't seem like a very spirited way to settle this whole mess. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 13:50, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * You are free to send private information to me by email (via Wikipedia) but note that I won't respond via email, only online. Note that if you are indeed that blocked user, though, there's nothing more to be done. The way to settle it is for you to successfully contest the block on that account or stop editing. No other option is available to you. --Yamla (talk) 13:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sounds like a false dichotomy but ok.
 * This all could've been completely avoided if not for spite and bias though, for real.
 * Though this whole experience has completely confirmed to me exactly why Wiki isn't a valid academic source. So there's that I guess. 97.112.207.221 (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
 * We already know that Wikipedia is not a reliable source and shouldn't be used for scholarly or academic work. 331dot (talk) 01:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request five
97.112.207.221 (talk) 05:29, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for block evasion. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.