User talk:97.125.171.221

October 2021
Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Time for Beany, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   DVdm (talk) 08:57, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Joe's Garage. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive.   DVdm (talk) 09:14, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Note: also, please have a look at wp:Edit warring and wp:BRD. - DVdm (talk) 09:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Blackface, you may be blocked from editing.   DVdm (talk) 09:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Joe's Garage. - DVdm (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - DVdm (talk) 09:26, 13 October 2021 (UTC)