User talk:97.71.138.2

November 2018
Hello, I'm DannyS712. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to WNYW have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. DannyS712 (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   19:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Zaidiyyah. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:56, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Julie Vega
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Julie Vega, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Baby miss fortune 03:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alicia Sánchez-Camacho have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Josep Piqué. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Maurice Ravel. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Slide Area, you may be blocked from editing. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Per WP:PROD, an article can be suggested for deletion if in the opinion of the editor, it is not notable. If you disagree, you may remove the template. You should learn wiki policy if you ever want to be admin, amigo! How difficult is that? How about assuming good faith? 97.71.138.2 (talk)
 * Ah yes, good faith. Why not give your reasons? Why are these now PRODED, for the first time, by you, after I revert your PROD of Maurice Ravel here? You really think he is a "non notable guy"? Florida amigo. Why should anyone want to be an admin? Martinevans123 (talk)


 * p.s. are you a sockpuppet of User:Fiji123 who was just indef blocked? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)


 * Who? Looks like some admin-wanna-be's needs to increase their assburger meds 97.71.138.2 (talk) 18:07, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Niles Spencer. This also applies to your multiple bad-faith PROD nominations and your repeated vandalism of other articles Voceditenore (talk) 17:25, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * *SO* Because you wrote the crapnon-notable articles in question... that makes it "bad faith"?97.71.138.2 (talk) 17:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Voceditenore (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for assholery. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Culture of Cuba, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. KNHaw  (talk)  20:26, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.