User talk:97.71.167.55

November 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Anti-Turkism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:37, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-Turkism. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Anti-Turkism was changed by 97.71.167.55 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874156 on 2019-11-18T16:38:29+00:00

December 2019
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Oviedo High School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CLCStudent (talk) 13:39, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2020
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:20, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Third Wave (experiment)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 16:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Estádio do Dragão—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to The Horse in Motion—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of WWE SmackDown Tag Team Champions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of WWE SmackDown Tag Team Champions, you may be blocked from editing. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 19:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Ruy (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to AEW World Championship—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:45, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Your recent editing history at AEW World Championship shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Czello 15:37, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — Czello 17:52, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Peculiar Undertone. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Euphrates have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Peculiar Undertone (talk) 13:23, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Lol1VNIO. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Mark McEwen—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. lol1 VNIO ( I made a mistake?  talk to me ) 15:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm Julietdeltalima. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Penne alla vodka, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  16:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello, I'm Filmssssssssssss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Religion in Afghanistan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 𝑭𝒊𝒍𝒎𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔𝒔 (talk) 13:41, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Liu1126. I noticed that in this edit to Ras el hanout, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liu1126 (talk) 14:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Frederick Winslow Taylor—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zerotalk 15:17, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Signing of the United States Declaration of Independence. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Patient Zerotalk 15:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)