User talk:97.83.7.113

e — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.225.56.203 (talk) 06:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm LakesideMiners. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Totalitarianism have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. ''Take it to the talk page. Please''  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 14:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Totalitarianism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''take it to the talk page. as I said.''  LakesideMiners Come Talk To Me! 14:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at German Workers' Party, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You have clearly been warned about engaging in edit wars on your page. Please do not add information without a reliable source, or remove information that is appropriately sourced. Wikipedia is not the place to right what you think are historical injustices or political biases; we go by how the sources describe an issue.'' —AFreshStart (talk) 21:02, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 21:35, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2022
Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to I Wanna Be Your Man, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 02:59, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Elvis Presley albums discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 03:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 01:11, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Introducing... The Beatles. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 08:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

August 2022
Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jesse Lee Peterson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli Talk  10:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Edits on August 5th, 2022
Hello, I'm Sam Walczak. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to New Right have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. You didn't source your claims for justification of removing the categorization. Even if you did, the umbrella category of Far-Right politics covers other non-US-Centric discussions.  Sam Walczak  Talk / Edits   15:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)