User talk:97.93.39.66

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dean Cain has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dean Cain was changed by 97.93.39.66 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.93385 on 2016-10-24T19:46:29+00:00.

June 2017
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Studio 71. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you.

Also, please do not use inaccurate edit summaries. By claiming that your promotional edits were "grammatical updates" this creates the impression that you are being intentionally deceptive. Our policy is to assume good faith but there is a limit. DanielRigal (talk) 21:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 97.93.39.66. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Studio 71, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. ''I just looked up your IP. It is registered to "Collective Digital Studios, LP" which is a clear conflict of interests.'' DanielRigal (talk) 21:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Studio 71. DanielRigal (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * That last edit wasn't really bad enough for me to report you but I would like to remind you that you are still on final warning. You have already been caught editing your own company's article from your own IP. You are only damaging their reputation by making them look like inept spammers. This is embarrassing. Please just stop. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:33, 17 July 2017 (UTC)