User talk:98.10.99.168

Hello, I'm Moriwen. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Battle of Ramadi (2004) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moriwen (talk) 03:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Diwaniya. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Moriwen (talk) 03:48, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Donkey Island, you may be blocked from editing. — Moriwen (talk) 03:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Juba (sniper). Meters (talk) 18:52, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi 98.10.99.168! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Juba (sniper) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Meters (talk) 18:53, 7 September 2023 (UTC)