User talk:98.113.137.185

March 2024
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for block evasion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- ferret (talk) 22:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I was blocked from edits in violation of WP:BLOCKNO while trying to put the incidents on the notice board. 98.113.137.185 (talk) 23:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You're blocked, you the individual, not just your account. Return to your main account to appeal. Any edits you make while block evading can and likely will be reverted. -- ferret (talk) 23:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * The appeal of the block sits with the person who made the invalid block in the midst of me posting the notice about the other behavior. I didn't leave my main account and I wasn't evading a block we have a signal adjusted wifi in the office and it happened to send the notice board message after they apparently blocked me. 98.113.137.185 (talk) 23:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * In other words. I work at a securities firm and my ip shifts constantly. It would be impossible to block. In 7 years I've never once had an issue and now suddenly these two have instablocked me for running across something that they have apparently had some rather consternated and questionable behavior about in the past. So I am requesting you unblock me to repost my administration notice as this seems to be a pattern of behavior by the pair. So that when I post it I am not flagged as an block evader. 98.113.137.185 (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * So, to recap, we're to believe that an anonymous editor randomly jumped into a dispute that's been dead for two months, about a draft page that isn't highly visible to the public, and started up into long-winded arguments that sound just like the blocked editor, and this is all just one giant coincidence? Really? Come on. Sergecross73   msg me  23:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm not a random editor. I've been editing for almost 8 years. We aren't allowed outside logins for security reasons. I don't believe "I" jumped in any dispute. I was reviewing and submitting Afc's(as I do frequently) and found an unhelpful comment. Being a curious person, the strange reaction to a clearly inappropriate remark being removed and the urgency of escalation caused me to review what was actually happening here. And it seems you are now making an accusation with no evidence. After having blocked me for....? 98.113.137.185 (talk) 23:51, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There appears to be a pugilistic nature to your interactions with users or users you perceive to be "new". You behavior in the original matter you are apparently upset by is questionable. Your behavior here is clearly in violation of the spirit and actual policies of our community. 98.113.137.185 (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, no experienced AFC reviewer would find a note that says to make sure you look at an article very closely for policy violations "unhelpful". You've given yourself away yet again with comments like that. Not to mention you write exactly like the blocked user in question. Stop block evading. Sergecross73   msg me  23:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm experienced, and I strongly felt it was. What was unusual is suddenly the same two people who were in conflict with the article creator suddenly started doing the same things he communicated poorly. As again here. There is clearly a number of problems with your interactions WP:AFG WP:BULLY No_personal_attacks and Improper use of blocking template. It seems you are giving yourself away, what are we suppose to believe? 98.113.137.185 (talk) 00:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * 98.113.137.185 (talk) 00:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * And to be clear. I am not an AFC reviewer. I was reviewing drafts for AFC submission. You should realize the difference and more importantly you shouldn't be abusing your experience. It seems you have been editing for some time as well. I would expect better behavior. 98.113.137.185 (talk) 00:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Then you should not review drafts at WP:AFC. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Then you should not review drafts at WP:AFC. &#45;- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. -- ferret (talk) 00:46, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 * There is very, very little doubt that this is a blocked user, who also had to have TPA revoked. -- ferret (talk) 00:47, 6 March 2024 (UTC)