User talk:98.113.8.17

December 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hurricane Isaias tornado outbreak. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Essays aren't policy. I would argue your edits fall into WP:NOTHERE territory at this point.'' – The Grid  ( talk )  07:23, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * How are my edits anywhere even near NOTHERE territory? I am trying to clarify to readers that while NCDC lists 18 injuries for the Philadelphia tornado, there were only 6. Also, it appears from your comment that essays should be disregarded which they should not. In addition, no policy against including the note has been posted. --98.113.8.17 (talk) 21:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Draft:Tropical Storm Danielle (2016), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 15:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Andrew5. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Girth Summit  (blether) 12:17, 20 July 2023 (UTC)