User talk:98.114.47.115

October 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Western Canada has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Western Canada was changed by 98.114.47.115 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.890394 on 2016-10-19T18:26:19+00:00.

February 2017
Hello, I'm Quenhitran. An edit you recently made to Presentation of Jesus at the Temple seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — ALittle Que nhi  ( talk to me ) 14:50, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. An edit you recently made to Our Lady of Guadalupe seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:39, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Robert Fulton— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Robert Fulton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Robert Fulton, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:42, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Robert Fulton.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:48, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.

November 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Yosemite National Park has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Yosemite National Park was changed by 98.114.47.115 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905638 on 2017-11-16T18:54:50+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Yosemite National Park. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   18:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:13, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to George Bailey (It's a Wonderful Life) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: George Bailey (It's a Wonderful Life) was changed by 98.114.47.115 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864566 on 2017-12-19T19:03:25+00:00.

May 2018
Hello, I'm Devonson4. An edit that you recently made to Our Lady of Pontmain seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Devonson4 (talk) 13:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Our Lady of Pontmain. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Devonson4 (talk) 13:54, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Our Lady of Pontmain, you may be blocked from editing. ''Presumed school account that is used for disruptive edits/vandalism.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

PLEASE only use the account for constructive edits or the ISP will be quickly blocked'' Nosebagbear (talk) 13:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2018
Hello, I'm The Herald. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Arctic fox have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:44, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2018
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Catholic Mariology, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Girth Summit  (blether) 14:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Solemnity, you may be blocked from editing. William Avery (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Athenian festivals. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Entranced98 (talk) 14:12, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Guana Island, you may be blocked from editing. Pbroks13 (talk) 18:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Guana Island. Pbroks13 (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019
Hello, I'm Wtmitchell. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Nativity of Mary— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 18:10, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Blablubbs. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Gulf—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 14:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm Squeakachu. I noticed that you recently removed content from Margaux Paolino without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Squeakachu (talk) 19:28, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Madeline. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:31, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Madeline was changed by 98.114.47.115 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961935 on 2021-06-16T12:31:54+00:00

January 2022
Hello, I'm Bongwarrior. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Joe Namath have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)