User talk:98.115.68.103

Han
Hi. You said: "Removed invented tradition as the history of Han (sources 4, 10) would not fit the category given the criticisms noted in sources 10 and examples given in sources 4-7 for invented tradition."

I undid your edit. Let me explain:

Regarding "source 4", Kim's examples are of "some form of han" being depicted, i.e., stories, poems, and songs that have depictions of grief (or another emotion).

Regarding "source 5", Pilzer (the author of "source 5") says "The idea of han as a national characteristic is a recent one." (page 171)

Regarding "source 6", that's the same guy from "source 4". He was a proponent of the "essentialist view" of han. He also said that the meaning of han is ambiguous.

Regarding "source 7", Suh Nam-dong was a theologian. According to Moon (2013), Korean theologians anachronistically argued that han was a national sentiment in premodern Korea. This is a clear example of an invented tradition.

Regarding "source 10", Shin (the author of "source 10") says that han is modern.

Bamnamu (talk) 04:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)