User talk:98.115.81.113

January 2024
Hi 98.115.81.113! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Trump v. Anderson several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I added the Williamson reaction to 2024 presidential eligibility of Donald Trump – maybe it will be stickier there. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * , it slides right off there for the same reasons it did at TvA: WP:RSOPINION, WP:ABOUTSELF, etc. With a secondary source, maybe it would stick. But the WP:ONUS is on whoever wants to include her opinion to source it properly. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:09, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I think we're going to disagree on this one. Why can a political opinion by a candidate not be sourced to anything at all that the candidate has published?
 * Doesn't matter, I found which I think satisfies everybody. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:14, 24 January 2024 (UTC)