User talk:98.167.185.72

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (98.167.185.72) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a new Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  13:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to Portal:Current events/2016 November 9, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Not everything the news posts is biased, Wikipedia isn't the place to right great wrongs. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Portal:Current events/2016 November 9. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Again PLEASE discuss the issue over at Portal talk:Current events/2016 November 9 (You can create the page). - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 04:48, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Sock Puppets Nov 10 2016
I'm pretty sure that the three editors that you are currently at war with are not sock puppets. Furthermore, even though you are not reverting edits, you are still in violation of the 3RR rule. I would advise you to stop your current behaviour. AuguMaugu (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

DS Advisement for Portal:Current events/2016 November 9
--Cameron11598 (Talk) 07:17, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
To enforce an arbitration decision and for violation of 1RR discretionary sanction that was placed on the page Portal:Current events/2016 November 9‎‎, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page:. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 17:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

24 November 2016
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to Portal:Current events/2016 November 21, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. - AuguMaugu (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. -- Amanda  (aka DQ) 11:17, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

January 2017
Hello, I'm Drewmutt. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Portal:Current events/2016 November 21— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Drewmutt (talk) 22:34, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Portal:Current events/2016 November 21. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drewmutt (talk) 22:39, 6 January 2017 (UTC)