User talk:98.171.254.4

June 2020
Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rowan Trollope without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   TheImaCow (talk) 17:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rowan Trollope, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that.   Ed6767  talk!  19:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thanks, the reason for the edit was conflict of interest / single purpose editing on the page. The Rowan Trollope page and editing history is not up to Wikipedia standards because of conflict of interest.
 * Thanks for clarifying - it'd be easier if you disclosed this in the edit summary, but I don't think this is an immediate case for removal unless it's promotional - thanks for your due diligence here, I'll look at the edit history and tag a COI. Ed6767  talk!  19:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Great, thank you.