User talk:98.175.55.76

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tim Pool. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 21:29, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please discuss your proposals on the talk page
Hi IP, your additions/changes have now been reverted a couple times and your latest one may be reverted again. The appropriate action to take is to discuss your proposals on the article's talk page so you can gain consensus from other editors. This is the mandated Wikipedia process (see WP:BRD). Continuing to simply editing the article with your preferred version stating you reasoning in edit summaries is not sufficient. Continuing this will lead to you being blocked, which should not be necessary but your actions might to warrant it. Please see WT:TP for guidance on using talk pages. You may have a point, but your approach is problematic. I hope this find this note helpful. S0091 (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thank you for pointing out the appropriate means of requesting an article to be edited, or reverted, or both. 98.175.55.76 (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem and thanks for "listening". These things can escalate quickly and often simply having a true discussion among editors can prevent that.  Best of luck. S0091 (talk) 22:30, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * It appears you've already been told about this, but please be aware that repeatedly restoring content you prefer, such as at Tim Pool, will be seen as edit warring. Instead, please follow advice and discuss on the article's talk page. I also recommend finding reliable, WP:INDY sources. Not all opinions are encyclopedic or noteworthy, so we need to provide context. The best way to do this is by citing independent sources. Using examples chosen by Wikipedia editors has a number of pitfalls, and should be avoided. Even if these examples are chosen by Pool himself, Wikipedia isn't a platform for promotion, so we still need some external reason to mention them. Again, the place to discuss this is the article's talk page. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 00:33, 9 December 2019 (UTC)