User talk:98.179.181.142

So, I've never looked into editing or providing feedback to wiki till now. I guess it's the big 'ask' that shows upon access. I use wikipedia ('w') a little. Not a lot, but enough to appreciate it's offerings. Normally, I contribute to worthwhile causes. And this would be one, except for what I find problematic.

Wikipedia seems to be overly influenced by leftist thinkers and liberals. There's quite a bias to much of what I read.

I use 'w' to research writers etc that I come across; to check their credentials, or to get basics on issues that arise from time to time. I also use many other sources of information as well. I'll read other things a person has written to get a feel for their perspective and to see if they're objective or just a shill pushing an agenda. Where did they go to school. What organizations or positions have they been in.

In the same way, I analyze and weigh the 'w' input. Over time I've seen that the leftist or 'woke' agenda seems to dominate and have read almost character assassination of someone whom I've learned is a balanced individual. Or, facts are skewed to misrepresent an issue - whether by commission or very often omission.

As a result I will not support 'w', and it will be too bad if you fold, but, oh well. Even though there is much good here, there's also much bad and I would rather do away with the bad, than sustain the good.