User talk:98.201.235.46

September 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Challenger 2. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bellowhead678 (talk) 17:20, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Challenger 2, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 18:45, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chieftain (tank).   P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 22:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tanks in the Cold War, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HunMaster (talk) 13:57, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2021
Hello, I'm Squeakachu. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fast battleship, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Squeakachu (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at South Dakota-class battleship (1939). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ktvptf (talk) 19:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

HMS Ramillies
Hello. Please stop removing this line; you are wrong, and so is whatever video you're referencing. Ramillies most certainly did not encounter Bismarck. Parsecboy (talk) 18:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at M48 Patton, you may be blocked from editing.   Shadowrvn728  ❯❯❯  Talk  17:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at HMS Ramillies (07)    Shadowrvn728  ❯❯❯  Talk  17:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at USS Lexington (CV-16). BilCat (talk) 22:35, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on USS Lexington (CV-16). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm DB1729. I noticed that you recently made an edit to USS Lexington (CV-16) in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. See here for the edit and summary in question.--DB1729 (talk) 17:48, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to USS Lexington (CV-16), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --DB1729 (talk) 18:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

USS Lexington (CV-16)
Hello. Please do not remove cite needed tags and dubious tags without first addressing the issue they raise, namely providing a reliable source and the fact you have contradicted yourself and have entered several different dates with respect to the ship's deployment duration: 1965, 1961 and 1962.

I suggest you initiate a discussion about this at the article's talk page. See WP:BRD. Expect that you will likely be asked to provide the source of your information.

In the mean time I recommend you refrain from editing USS Lexington (CV-16) and any closely related articles on the topic until you can reach a consensus with the editor(s) you are in dispute with. Thank you. --DB1729 (talk) 02:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)