User talk:98.210.120.129

August 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Problematic social media use, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop inappropriately adding a tag based on your opinion. Zim Zala Bim  talk 15:34, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

The article is defamation (such as Libel and Slander) against the media publishing industry. It is also defamation against the music industry because most most music is now digital music and NO musicians are "addicted" to social media. Are you trying to get sued for libel?
 * Please be aware of our policy against legal threats. And per WP:PROD, proposed deletion tags cannot be re-added once removed. If you have legitimate concerns about an article, take them to the talk page. Deleting the whole article is most likely not the solution. – bradv  15:54, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:07, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.