User talk:98.236.8.139

April 2024
The material is NOT copyrighted material. The material is being quoted and the source given. STOP removing the edit, as it is NOT copyrighted material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.236.8.139 (talk • contribs)
 * It literally says "© Copyright 2024 Synod of the Trinity" at the bottom of the page you are copypasting from. You can quote sources but 676 words is not a quote, it's a reproduction. -- D'n'B-t -- 19:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your edit to Presbytery of Redstone has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. -- D'n'B-t -- 18:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Presbytery of Redstone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. It's clear that the text you're adding is copypasted from a copyrighted source, see the above message about why this is not acceptable on Wikipedia. -- D'n'B-t -- 18:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -- D'n'B-t -- 18:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

The latest edit was NOT copyrighted material. It was all information from various sources put into the persons own words. YET it was removed and blocked. It was NOT copyrighted material.
 * Incorrect. And it's the same with the edit you made from another IP. Replacing "savages" with "Native Americans" is not enough. But there's another problem, or two, really. First of all, your behavior here--edit warring, refusing to properly communicate, that's problematic. But second, you think that paraphrasing an organizational website gives you text that's proper to insert in an encyclopedic article--that's also incorrect, and you couldn't be bothered to put a reference in there, let alone an independent, reliable secondary source. Drmies (talk) 20:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)