User talk:98.27.52.243

Your edits to Martin Agronsky
If you want to add information, make sure it is significant and has a reliable source. Your own knowledge does not count as a reliable source. You should not add information to sentences that is not included in the pre-existing sources of the sentence, without adding another source, which makes it appear like the new information is sourced when it is not. And, you should not continue to reinstate your preferred version without discussion after multiple reversions. You have broken multiple rules of editing Wikipedia without trying to improve, and if you continue like this, could have your IP range blocked from the website. Nobody wants to see new editors blocked, but as an editor with one purpose and no will to discuss or compromise with bad edits and editing practice, you are making yourself disruptive. In regards your specific edits at the Martin Agronsky article: 1. numerous biographies and obituaries (including the top-tier American National Biography) say that he was divorced from his second wife. If you can present an equally- or more reliable source that says he was not, preferably which is also recent and says the other highly reliable sources were mistaken, then a note can be added. 2. ask yourself if his ex-wife's death, coming many years after his own, is apt for inclusion. And then find a source for it before including. As well as reading the links above, feel welcome to ask at the WP:Teahouse for help on citing references. Kingsif (talk) 11:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, if you are a relative, it would be appropriate for you to acknowledge a conflict of interest. Note that knowing article subjects in real life does not give you any editing privileges on the articles about them. Please read the essay on conflict of interest thoroughly before making any acknowledgment, though, for identity protection. You do not need to reveal your identity in any statement of conflict of interest. Kingsif (talk) 11:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)