User talk:98.42.61.224

January 2021
Hello, I'm Waggers. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Toki Pona—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. WaggersTALK  17:45, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of centenarians (authors, editors, poets and journalists). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 23:09, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 05:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of centenarians (authors, editors, poets and journalists). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:27, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Inner Mongolia. Mojoworker (talk) 00:00, 7 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Hey the Windows XP image was taken in California, Not Inner Mongolia, that's why I reverted it. GameEnd (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Rubbish computer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Lord Haw-Haw—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:40, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 19:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at List of animated feature films of 2013. Rosalina2427 (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Rubbish computer. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 11:49, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gematogen has been accepted
 Gematogen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Redirect-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Gematogen help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 23:13, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm HelenDegenerate. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Aleh Negev have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Helen (💬📖) 22:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Aleh Negev. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. aeschylus (talk) 22:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Aleh Negev, you may be blocked from editing. aeschylus (talk) 22:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:03, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2021
Hello, I'm Sirdog. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Woman Is the Nigger of the World—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. — Sirdog (talk) 22:01, 28 September 2021 (UTC)