User talk:98.51.2.150

October 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Armed Forces of Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:35, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * my edits are not disruptive and are supported by news sources that are compliant with wikipedia's terms of use. please stop undoing my edits because you are trying to uphold a political narrative that runs counter to the truth. 98.51.2.150 (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Armed Forces of Ukraine. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * again, i have not vandalized anything. my edits are compliant with wikipedia's terms of use, i provided well known western news sources such as progressive, salon and the guardian. you are reverting my edits because they run counter to the false narrative you're attempting to push on this site and it is actually you who is violating this site's terms of service by reverting these edits to preserve your false narrative. 98.51.2.150 (talk) 09:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DatGuyTalkContribs 09:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * this is why i never donate to this site anymore. look at what you've become 98.51.2.150 (talk) 10:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * its no longer an encyclopedia. it's just propaganda and you don't even bother trying to hide it. just ban people after falsely accusing them of being "disruptive" with no explanation, after they made well-sourced edits. 98.51.2.150 (talk) 10:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Repeatedly adding contentious claims sourced to op-eds by non-experts and accusing others of engaging in propaganda is quite obviously disruptive. Kleinpecan (talk) 10:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

how were they disruptive? you are all shameless propagandists. you dismiss articles written by the same publications and same journalists who you freely use all over this website whenever their narrative is conducive to yours as "op-eds" by "non-experts". it is plain as day to anyone with any semblance of reason what is actually going on here and you should be ashamed of yourselves

Your pathetic threats of banning my dynamic IP address are also not particularly scary, and only further serve to illustrate your pettiness and utter contempt for the truth
 * Scaring you was not the intention, just stating a fact. If you are going to evade this or future blocks, then that is what it is. Good day. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)