User talk:98.92.26.162

from Sequaj (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

To contributors:

I do not agree with the criticism section in the PSP product review. It shows unfavourable bias. First, the affirmations are not supported, and until they are, should be removed. Second, most software in the low to mid-range photo editing space could be subject to very similar criticms ( country-based pricing, undocumented code additions, product stability, etc.). There is no explanation why PSP should be treated differently.

While there have been numerous criticsm of PSP, there are also many very positive reviews of recent versions of the software, both by press and by photo editing enthusiasts. These more favourable views are not being reflected in the article.

examples of favourable user review: http://www.amazon.com/review/R77O6L7FE1BHW/ref=cm_cr_pr_viewpnt#R77O6L7FE1BHW http://www.amazon.com/review/R3QJ69ZE3QKUBS/ref=cm_cr_pr_viewpnt#R3QJ69ZE3QKUBS and many others

I am a new hire at Corel and therefore do not want to add my own bias to the article by making changes to it. That said, I believe the criticm is not fuly justified - nor is it properly supported. For the sake of protecting Wikipedia from bias, I believe it should be removed until a less biased text is inserted, or at least a comment to the fact that there have been positive reviews from users and the press should be inserted to reduce or remove the apparence of bias.

Sequaj (talk) 21:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)