User talk:98smithg2

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Gazpacho 08:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Lazybaby.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lazybaby.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:05, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Lonley.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Lonley.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 00:05, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Several images listed for deletion
Several images that you uploaded, Image:Lonley.JPG, Image:Lazybaby.JPG and Image:Lazydork.JPG, have been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --bainer (talk) 09:01, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Lazydork
Hi, you recently deleted my article on lazydork, please explain why this artical was deleted? i dont see what reason you have for deleting him. He is the biggest star on youtube, he has been in several newspaper articals across the globe. 98smithg2 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 98smithg2 (talk • contribs).


 * The article was deleted under speedy deletion criterion number seven for articles, "article[s] about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject." The article made no claim as to why the subject was particularly important or notable. If you would like to contest the deletion, you can ask for the deletion to be reviewed at deletion review. You might like to see this page for advice if you wish to write a new article on the subject.
 * In case you didn't know, you can leave your signature on talk pages by typing four tildes after your message. --bainer (talk) 14:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Communism. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:04, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tony Blair, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Tony Blair, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 15:09, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for vandalism
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Gwernol 15:46, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during September 10 2006 to Tony Blair
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 1568 00:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Communism
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. DVD+ R/W 00:53, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during September 10 2006 to Communism
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 1568 00:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to User:DVD R W
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVD+ R/W 00:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

'''This is your final warning. If you continue to vandalize pages on Wikipedia, make inappropriate edits or personal attacks, including inappropriate or offensive edit summaries, or continue to cause problems in other ways, you will be blocked from editing indefinitely.''' Ryūlóng 00:58, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been indefinitely blocked by User:Antandrus, from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. You are not prevented from viewing Wikipedia, but please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. This also includes vandalism-only accounts (which means that the user is using Wikipedia for vandalism only).--1568 01:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)