User talk:99.116.180.81

July 2019
Your recent edits to User talk:Mrschimpf could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 19:28, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making legal threats or taking legal action. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:53, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
I tried to issue Mr. Schrimpf an apology, but he deleted the apology from the talk section regarding the issue. Essentially, we had an overzealous employee, among our higher-ups, who thought he had the authority to make that degree of threat and is also old enough to not understand just how wikipedia works. I did admittedly try to push my own written edit through a few times, but I'm now trying to write a correctly-sourced version. The purpose is not even to delete the legal action (which I believe I included - I and almost everyone here was uninvolved with the company when that was relevant, so we don't care), but to deliver a longer history of the company. We're pushing for a relaunch, and my argument is that we need a wikipedia with greater detail into the company's history, because investors actually take that seriously as a sign of legitimacy. I'm trying to go through more experienced channels to have our work published (with accurate info) and protected, so if you have any advice on how best to pursue this, I would really appreciate it!