User talk:99.146.249.129

Joel Osteen
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Joel Osteen, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Basileias (talk) 13:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I would second this, as well, as I just reverted your repeated changes to the Joel Osteen article. If you do not understand verifiability and reliable source, particularly as they related to Biographies of Living Persons, feel free to ask questions on my talk page.  Also, please be aware of the Three-revert Rule, as you've already made two identical revisions that are improperly sourced.  Thank you!--Lyonscc (talk) 19:58, 20 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The post is verifiable and 100% accurate. You are censoring an article that is relevant. I will not argue with you, because I can see that it will be fruitless no matter what I say or do. You clearly have an agenda. Your evangelical profile userboxes are enough to warrant question as to your bias. The article is neutral.


 * I have set up a section on the talk page for discussion of your desired change. Since you appear to be an anonymous user, please familiarize yourself with WP:BLP, WP:NOR, and WP:NPOV, along with the essay WP:TE.  I happen to have a great deal of dislike for Osteen, but at the same time I have a desire that Wikipedia be encyclopedic, neutral and fair, particularly in its dealings with biographies of living persons (my particular area of focus).  Please also note that if you make further changes without going through the talk page to work them out, I will have to add you to the 3RR noticeboard - something I don't really have time or desire to mess around with.--Lyonscc (talk) 21:36, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Joel Osteen. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Basileias (talk) 01:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * See also: WP:NOTTHEM. — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 04:32, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Third official warning
Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Joel Osteen. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Basileias (talk) 01:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Fourth warning
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Joel Osteen, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Basileias (talk) 03:03, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Joel Osteen. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. And you've already been reported for vandalism anyway, so you might as well stop. Calabe1992 (talk) 03:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)