User talk:99.192.59.98/Archive 1

You is sockpuppet
You is sockpuppet, this is not allowed. If you do not stop, you will be blocked. Subtropical-man (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop using multiple IPs to get your point accross. It is classed as sockpupettry and is not acting in good faith. Please also use the article talk page to discuss changes. Don't forget to use WP:BRD when discussing changes. MisterShiney   ✉    23:38, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * You need to learn what a dynamic IP is before making other baseless accusations like this. I have no control over what address my ISP assigns nor how often they change it. 99.192.90.239 (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Stargate (film). Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. ''Saying my edit is unconstructive when you are Edit Warring accross multiple IP's is rude and also in violation of policy. In future please follow WP:BRD and discuss a change rather than giving a short abrupt edit summaries. It is more constructive and you are less likely to lock horns with other established editors, especially when editing from an IP address with few if any other changes. If your IP address is not static, then you may wish to consider creating an account. '' MisterShiney    ✉    23:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * It is hard to assume good faith when you provide no explanation for an edit even after it has been pointed out three times in edit summaries that the edit is merely enforcing MOS:FILM and there already was a discussion on the talk page where two other editors explained that the edit is valid. Your edit looks entirely like bad faith in that context. So calling your edit "unconstructive" seems entirely warranted. Try reading the talk page or the MOS before making unexplained reverts like this in the future. 99.192.90.239 (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Regardless. Please assume good faith in all your future dealings with established editors, especially in said summaries you did not reference the part of Film MOS (it's pretty long) that you are talking about. Calling an established editors edits as "unconstructive" is not constructive at building positive relations with editors. Especially when you are engaging in an edit war and being equally unconstructive.

There was no discussion or attempt at mediation from your part at all on the talk page at the time of the said edit. Quite frankly when I see an IP editor engaging in edit warring behaviour, I act. In future, I strongly suggest (having been where you are), that you get an account and get yourself a reputation as a positive contributor. MisterShiney   ✉    20:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

get an account
As an IP editor that has a dynamic IP I suggest you register a user name - this will help people see your a serious editor and not using your dynamic IP (like a shock) to be sneaky ... also creating an account will hide the fact your from Halifax. See Why create an account?.Moxy (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2013 (UTC)