User talk:99.225.212.107/sandbox

Articles Evaluation:

Cat food - allergies section

-Is there anything missing that could be added

-Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? No.

From Talks

It appears that this section contradicts itself (as Wikipedia so often does), not just within the same article or section, but in the same sentence: "There is no breed, sex or age predilection, although some breeds are commonly affected." Maybe by some chance someone will defend this sentence as being non-contradictory through a weird analysis of pronouns and word-meanings, but it is not clear all the same. The first phrase of the sentence asserts "there is no breed...predilection" then followed by this phrase "but some breeds are commonly affected. ("predilection" apparently being a word for "favoring")

If the statement that a "breed is commonly affected" has to be able to be verified (this is an encyclopedia), that would mean the breed has some greater propensity of being affected ("favored" if you will).

There seems to be a lot of section hording by anonymous and emotional authors in this talk page, but encyclopedic content should dispassionate.Retran (talk) 13:23, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Natural Balance Pet Foods - Limited Ingredient Pet Foods

Does not mention cats. A bit of advertising on the part about "many varieties"

AnnaMay22 (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)