User talk:99.226.117.75

December 2015
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Urijah Faber— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ( ✉ ) 19:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Junior dos Santos. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Quinton Jackson. Sundayclose (talk) 00:37, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 03:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Frank Trigg, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 22:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I think you got this one wrong—but, with the previous notes on this talk page, who could blame you? If you compare the offending edit (or the earlier attempt to make the same change) against the source (UFC.com) we used at that point, you can see that the edit changed the height and weight to match the source—an improvement, not vandalism. I know this is stale, but I'm flagging it in case it comes up again. Thanks! —  Rebbing    talk   07:23, 9 February 2016 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rafael dos Anjos. —  Rebbing    talk   07:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.