User talk:99.236.189.100

September 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. de Bivort 05:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Ex-gay has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 04:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Please do not use article pages for general discussion of the topic. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:26, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Note: Placing false user warnings, such as this and this, can be viewed as harrassment of those who reverted your vandalism (which can be seen here, here, here, etc). Continuing to disrupt Wikipedia with vandalism and false user warnings could result in your account being blocked from editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:36, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. tedder (talk) 04:38, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 23:53, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Fat acceptance movement. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. MuffledThud (talk) 00:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

deletions April 2010
Please stop deleting referenced content from the starcraft pro gaming article. de Bivort 16:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on StarCraft professional competition. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 19:44, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:Debivort. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 20:53, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. de Bivort 23:36, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

NOW ITS PERSONAL DE BIVORT !

Re SC2GG Bias
What other commentators do you believe should be included? NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs/Vote! 00:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The criterion I used was whether I could find an independent source about them, e.g. one of the gosugamer interviews, and subscriber numbers on youtube. Ranshin didn't meet these criteria, for example and is from sc2gg. I think the criteria I used were totally reasonable, and if other people meet them, they should be added, rather than removing the sourced material without any explanation. de Bivort 02:19, 6 April 2010 (UTC)