User talk:99.243.121.245

I added very few words to the text, and only to provide balanced reading to what was in the text. You seem to have made a career of editing and controlling other online info, but my change was just innocuous and balanced. Here are examples of your extraordinary efforts online: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SummerPhDv2.0


 * You added unsourced, nonsensical material to an article concerning an old song, dating from 1873 (when it was first published) or earlier. You added that, gee, maybe the song was from later than 1873 (when it was first published).
 * That is not "balanced reading". That's nonsense.
 * Yes, all of my edits are available for review. If you'd like a leg up, start with my talk page and talk page archives for responses from many people who have disagreed with me over the years. Some have notes as to later events with editors being blocked for later vandalism or edit warring or being found to be sock puppets. Don't forget that I edited earlier as . Happy hunting! - Sum mer PhD v2.0 06:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Old-Time Religion have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Sum mer PhD v2.0 03:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.