User talk:99.247.114.248

July 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Woody Harrelson have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 14:46, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Woody Harrelson. Thank you. 4TheWynne  (talk  •  contributions)  23:38, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

and, you've both reverted edits without leaving edit summaries,, and left vandalism or "unsourced" warnings for this user, but I'm afraid you're mistaken. I've reinstated their edit, and noted this in my edit summary: No reason given for revert of good-faith and valid edit. The information is correct, and properly sourced according to MOS:LEADCITE in the first [i.e., "Early life"] section. Per MOS:BIRTHNAME and MOS:QUOTENAME, this is the way the lead sentence should read. To the editor, 99.247.114.248, thanks for your helpful contribution. I'm guessing though, that you probably weren't aware of the above rules, and were a bit lucky that your edit turned out to be correct, despite being reverted by two well-experienced and knowledgeable editors. Especially for biographies of living persons, it is extremely important to cite reliable sources for information, and never add anything if you can't remember and specify where you read it. It's also important to leave edit summaries, which I see you did the second time around, so thanks for that. --IamNotU (talk) 23:06, 25 July 2019 (UTC)