User talk:99.55.200.68

Okay? You aimlessly just calling it pagan isn't a good argumentative point. Everything viewed here should be viewed in a legalistic stand-point. there are examples of Y -> I -> J structure passed between languages Here is an example of a Y --> I --> J structure show in a similar context to the proposed "Yeshua" -> "Iēsoûs" -> Iēsūs -> "Jesus"

The word jot is from the Latin word jota transliterating the Greek word Ιώτα "iota". The subtext being the Hebrew letter yodh as written in the Aramaic alphabet. For a language to borrow a word in a case example, the word in question will (usually) be changed to fit the meaning or the borrowers language's phonetic rules. Thus from the observations of a similar process and transition between the same languages mentioned through-out this thread it's obvious that there is a connection (not phonetically.) to the Yeshua - Jesus connection.

I find it hard that many points where made including the mentioning of the "Septuagint" which has been brought up that it was made Pre-Jesus times and by a Bi-lingual Greek and Hebrew speaking community that translated "Yeshua" -> "Iēsoûs" Thus the "theory of" hail Zeus, or a Greek mythological standpoint doesn't fit how the character "Jesus" was named, since the point is just that they couldn't move on from Hellenism? which doesn't make since Hellenism died around the same time Christianity came around. (also the fact that Greeks where not the only people that spoke Greek since it was the English of it's time, it's like saying that all the English speakers are from England so the analogy of Zeus and Jesus is limited even further.)

If your point that it's a sect or a religion that you don't believe in then I suggest you go to a discussion form more akin to that topic!