User talk:99.82.241.10

something of a non sequitur?
I often opine, as a self-proclaimed, "gistist" - that is, I am more interested in the broader ideas and motifs - I really don't see much functional difference in saying, "that man is possessed by the devil!", and "that man has a deficiency in x, y, or z chemicals". At the end of the day, people are merely pointing out the differences in 'that man'.

Now, 'Indigo Children'. Generally, I am on board with it being mostly commercialized nonsense. However, going back to my 'possessed by the devil' thing, what is a mental illness besides the existence of a difference/straying from the average or norm?

Or in other words, take for instance this hypothetical exchange:

Person A: "I have found a group of people different from the rest of us!"

Person B: "No, you have found a group of people with mental illness!"

Person A: "Yes... that's what I said, wasn't it? I found a group of people different from us"

How to clinically measure intuition, et cetera, seems a bit taxing to imagine.