User talk:A.K.A.47

'''AS OF NOVEMBER 20TH 2005, THIS USER SHOULD BE CONSIDERED INACTIVE. DO NOT EXPECT ANY ANSWER FROM USER A.K.A.47 IF YOU POST ON THIS PAGE'''

rehash of UK CotW
Hiya, I've made a few modifications to the UK Wikipedians' Collaboration of the Week, and I thought you'd be interested in the new page and helping out again with it, as you have contributed in the past! :) Talrias | talk 21:10, Mar 14, 2005 (UTC)

Template:footybio-stub
Been doin' a load of these over the weekend. However, I do think we wish to keep the italicization of the initial text, am I right? Therefore version 1 (above) should become version 2 (below)? Is this correct?

Thank you Bobo192 22:18, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Apologies. That should have been the other way around. But I have just made those changes to the page and thus all should be well. Thank you. Bobo192 22:25, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Category:Football (soccer) player stubs

Category:Football (soccer) player stubs

Spanish Translation of the Week
The article you voted for, Origin of the name California, is now the Translation of the Week. Please help work on it. &mdash; J3ff 22:50, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image:Footybio-Stub Icon.jpg
Did you create this image yourself? If you did, can you add a source and a licence. Also, can you transcode to PNG and make it transparent? Cheers. Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 02:31, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * I would delete it. I am not certain as to the copyright on that clipart, but knowing MS it is probably personal use only. Check http://www.openclipart.org for something, that is all pd stuff. Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 00:14, May 18, 2005 (UTC)
 * I am going to delete this and the other image, Soccerballplain.gif, as they have been replaced. Burgundavia (&#9992; take a flight?) 09:36, May 31, 2005 (UTC)

Olympic Articles
Hey, just curious to know why we have a top-8 table not a medals table for Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics. It would be an interesting piece to put on a sub page, e.g. "Cycling at the 2004 Summer Olympics - Country Performance Comparison" (i'm sure there could be a more snappy title), but to my mind a medals table would be more proper. At any case, cheers for the work being done on this cluster of pages.
 * A.K.A.47 09:31, 20 May 2005 (UTC)


 * My impression of the result of the discussion from Talk:2004 Summer Olympics medal count was that a top eight table was preferred. Because of this, I've been using that (not only on cycling, but other sports as well).  However, I have no personal attachment to it and would not mind having a regular medals table instead.  I would recommend avoiding any more subpages than are absolutely necessary (and I don't think a top eight table would be necessary). -- Jonel 19:48, 20 May 2005 (UTC)

Uncategorized Pages
I deleted the category. Users are not subject to categorizing: categories are a tool for articles. Users are not in the article space. Your Russel's paradox joke is appreciated. mikka (t) 01:51, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * fair enough - it was a bad joke, unnecessary and i think i must have been very bored at the time
 * I - amazingly - am not playing Tardis Tennis at the moment. 09:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Animal Farm
Hey man, thanks for contributing to Animal Farm. May I ask you that you please cite your source about the spy thingie in the paragraph you contributed? Thanks! Peace! Project2501a 20:30, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Re: 2007 cricket World Cup
Re: CaribDigita here, Just wanted to send a quick note back about the line: '' "Australia, India, England and West Indies have been placed in separate pools to allow for logistics."'' I really can't say that I know what this means. " 13:18, 22 April 2005 - User:66.105.208.35 " looks like when/where it was added on that page (2007 cricket World Cup). which I know the ID isn't very helpful, I suspect they may have gotten it from somewhere on the ICC site? CaribDigita 5 July 2005 02:07 (UTC)

Fulham F.C.
I apologise. Me and Arwel talked about it and neither of us liked it. But I agree I was rather hasty in reverting it, even despite mine and his discussion. It's not a life or death matter. I'll bring it up with him again to see what he thinks before doing anything hasty again. Until we reach consensus between the four of us, I think I'll let well alone. -humbly slinks away-

And, at the risk of grovelling.. sorry. Bobo192 | Edits


 * As I say, I'm going to ask people before I make any decisions about anything else. It wasn't so much a decision against the format itself, more about the fact that I've become rather attached to the other format while it's been around. I do that sometimes. As for Lee Clark, It's probably safer I don't get involved with that argument, which is why I probably will end up doing so. Cheers. Bobo192 | Edits

Image Tagging Image:Orse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Orse.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use .)  See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 17:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)


 * well, i personally took that photo, so i've clarified that on the page image page, and tagged it as . is this ok?
 * Ahkayah cuarenta y siete 19:14, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

That's perfect. Thank you very much. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 20:15, 6 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Well, thanks for your advice
 * Ahkayah cuarenta y siete 21:25, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

2 Not particularly related replies
Hi!, Do not worry, unless it has developed a mind of its own it is just working (roughly) alphabetically through the articles, you may notice it more if your articles you have in your watchlist either 1) generally begin with the same letter or 2) you consistently make some kind of minor error. Although, interstingly it wouldn't be very difficult at all to make a stalker bot, it would be prettly pointless though!

I certainly hope Wikipedia is not some kind of experiment, or if it is a an experiment, that is only an unavoidable side effect of the way the encyclopedia is created (which is most likely). I think Jimbo would agree judging from this email, however it is an interesting point.

Essentially, if it is even partially deliberately an experiment, then I am no longer interested at all, and I think many would agree. thanks -  Martin   17:41, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello A.K.A.47! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 7 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:43, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Peter Hooton -
 * 2) Roy Boulter -
 * 3) Ben Leach -
 * 4) Ray Lewington -
 * 5) Peter Manfredo -
 * 6) Liam Fontaine -
 * 7) Simon Morgan -

Proposed deletion of Brent Cooper


The article Brent Cooper has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 16:37, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Reid


The article Jonathan Reid has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NBOX

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 16:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Steve Grimes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Grimes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steve Grimes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 23:43, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Ways to improve Steve Grimes
Hi, I'm Batreeqah. A.K.A.47, thanks for creating Steve Grimes!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please link to Steve Grimes website.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Batreeqah ( Talk ) (Contribs) 00:52, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Orse.jpg


The file File:Orse.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Brent Cooper (boxer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent Cooper (boxer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brent Cooper (boxer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JTtheOG (talk) 03:54, 9 February 2022 (UTC)