User talk:A.R.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HolyRomanEmperor 12:09, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image:Radar Kub.jpg
Hi, I notice you have tagged Image:Radar Kub.jpg with a generic PD tag. Did this image come from a US military site? If so, could you please add the appropriate more-specific public domain tag. Could you please also do the same for any similar images you've uploaded and also provide the source URL in the image description. Thanks! David Johnson [ T|C ] 00:49, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Objecto-libertarianism
Please consider No original research carefully. The term "objecto-libertarianism" does not appear in any dictionary, encyclopedia or web page I've checked, which suggests it is not notable enough to appear in an encyclopedia.

The material could belong to existing articles like objectivism and libertarianism, but "objecto-libertarianism" as a concept is as far as I can tell not treated by any secondary source we could use as an encyclopedia. Wikipedia does not promote novel ideas.

As it stands, this article would almost certainly be deleted if a vote were to be held on it. Consider if there's a better way to incorporate the information than a separate article. JRM · Talk 14:33, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

I've put a Merge tag on it suggesting it be merged with Neo-Objectivism which, from my understanding of Objecto-libertarianism as described by the article, is the vastly more common name for the same thing. I suggest further discussion of this be moved to Talk:Objecto-libertarianism. Kurt Weber 14:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Rafale and CVN 74.jpg
Regarding the above, a good find and excellent addition to the Rafale page! Mark83 22:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:5N62.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:5N62.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags.

Image copyright problem with Image:TPS-59_in_a_radome.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TPS-59_in_a_radome.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 23:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:Rafale and CVN 74.jpg again
Hi, I was wondering why you removed this image from the Dassault Rafale article and why you removed the copyright information from the image itself. The image is a nice addition to the article and the copyright seems to be in order .--Sylvain Mielot 19:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:Rafale and CVN 74.jpg again
Hi, The reason is that there is an image in Wikicommons with the same name, and I wish that picture to appear in the "Dassault Rafale" article, but there is simply no way to have it appear unless the picture in Wikipedia is *removed* first; And since there is no way to delete anything from Wikipedia (such as an image), the only it *is* possible to delete the Wikipedia image is to remove its copyright information and wait for it to be automatically removed.
 * Cool! thanks for the answer. --Sylvain Mielot 01:32, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Designation of USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63)
Hi I noticed that you changed the designation of USS Kitty Hawk (CV-63) to USS Kitty Hawk (CV 63). While this really isn't that big of a deal, we have come to a consensus over at Naming conventions (ships), to use the hypen in USN ships. This is basically to keep a standard format for the naming of ship articles throughout wikipedia. I have reverted your changes and if you still disagree then I'd ask that you or I start a discussion over at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (ships). Thanks -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 16:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

USS Ranger (CVA-61) vs USS Ranger (CV-61)
I noticed that you moved USS Ranger (CVA-61) to USS Ranger (CV-61). I reverted this move for two reasons:
 * 1) this isn't the proper way to move an article.  For more info please see Help:Moving a page
 * 2) I'm not certain this is the most common designation for this ship.  Since it was redesignated in 1975, that gives it 18 years under one designation and another 18 years under the other.  If you still think it should be moved, add it to Requested moves, and make a case for it there.  Thanks -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 19:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to SS-1 (disambiguation)
Your recent edit to SS-1 (disambiguation) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:19, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

SS-1
I've fixed this. You seem to have moved SS-1 to SS-1 (disambiguation), then cut and paste the content into SS-1 (rifle), finally updating the disambiguation page. What this did was left the editing history for the rifle article with the disambiguation page. What I've done is move the disambig page to SS-1 (rifle) so it has all the edit history, and then create the disambiguation page as a new page. --pgk( talk ) 19:34, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:ZPU-2 of Hizballah.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ZPU-2 of Hizballah.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Night Gyr 15:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:060706-N-0000X-001.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:060706-N-0000X-001.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Note that any unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Dual Freq 13:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Herzliya airport
Hi A.R.

You should not have moved Herzliya airport to Herzlia airport, as that spelling is inconsistant with the transliteration adopted for הרצליה - Herzliya (which you'll find that Herzlia redirects to). In the future, please try to investigate a bit more before moving pages, as it is slightly difficult to undo a page move. Thanks for your effort though, and keep on editing. Cheers,  Tewfik Talk 06:23, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

STS-121
Hi. I have reverted your edit involving using th in dates. Please read the Manual of Style for dates -- dates are written as  dd mmmm yyyy  and would then be formatted for each user's special preferences. Here is the format you used specifically listed as an example of an erraneous format. If you would like to see dates in such format, go to My Preferences and choose the format you want from the Date & Time tab. Regards and happy editing. └ VodkaJazz / talk ┐ 18:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:CFB Cold Lake satellite view.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:CFB Cold Lake satellite view.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 17:23, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:S Harper high.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:S Harper high.jpg, has been listed at Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 69.194.188.200 23:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:FPS-117.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FPS-117.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:22, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Its and It's
I'm pretty sure the first usage of its was grammatically correct seeing how it's is a replacement of it is. A good way to check is to see if 'it is' works in that case. "Despite it is wet climate" for example, which as apparent, doesn't work. Lily Towers talk 06:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:ZPU-4 of Hizballah.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:ZPU-4 of Hizballah.JPG. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Banzoo 20:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:AN TPS-59 radar.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AN TPS-59 radar.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Redirects
STOP!

Why are you creating all of those redirects? They don't seem to serve much of a purpose, and they're spamming the recent changes.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 09:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Designations for Soviet and Russian weapons
STOP!

Please, read Naming conventions (missiles and unguided rockets): "Russian/Soviet missiles and rockets: Design bureau and number: Vympel R-37, Bisnovat R-40. If the name without design bureau is much more common, use that: S-200. The NATO reporting name, though not part of the official designation, are in many cases the name by which the aircraft is best known in the West, and can redirect to the article under the correct name. " Then answer my questions below.

Why are you constantly replacing official designationg used by manufacturers in names of Soviet and Russian weapons by their NATO reporting names? And why do you call NATO's designations "standard ones"? Should we use Soviet designations as standard for NATO weapons? It looks absurd for me. Look, for example, at Chinese weapons C-802, Silkworm missile, Taiwanese Hsiung Feng I, etc. - names, given by their manufacturers are always preferred.

By the way, why do you revert other additions without any explanations - like here, here, here, here, etc.? You dislike mentioning GRAU in the article - leaving e.g. a bunch of numbers 9К330/9К331/9К332 instead of proposed by me "GRAU designation of the earliest model is 9K330", like you did here? Or what? Cmapm 19:22, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Conspicuous consumption
Hello, I noticed you put a Critical reading tag on the Conspicuous consumption article saying it is disputed. I wonder if you could explain your dispute on the talk page. Otherwise I am minded to remove it. Thanks. -- zzuuzz(talk) 22:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Suggestion
Could you please stop introducing your POV and finally take into account Wikipedia community's recommendations concerning designations for Soviet missiles here? Or should I report you as an "annoying user" or take similar unpleasant actions in response to your POV pushing? Cmapm 00:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Critical reading
Template:Critical reading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — coe l acan — 00:23, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:Russian surface-to-air missiles
I noticed that you have reverted my improvements of this template. All links I changed were not the real links, but redirects. For example, SA-1 Guild is a redirect to S-25 Berkut and so on. If you look how the template looks like on that page, you can notice that the link in the template transformed to the bold text. When you're using redirects, it will stay as the recurrent self-link. --Yuriy Lapitskiy 14:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Master of Business Administration
Please note that Manual of style states, "Contemporary style omits many periods and spaces that were traditionally required. For example, PhD is preferred over Ph.D. or Ph. D." Likewise, MBA is preferred over M.B.A. I have reverted all instances of M.B.A. back to MBA in the Master of Business Administration article. -Amatulic 22:40, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Straightflush01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Straightflush01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:27, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:5N62_1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:5N62_1.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BigDT 03:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Saar5.jpg
What is the source of this image? and why do you think it's PD?Ingsoc 00:15, 30 June 2007 (UTC) Could ypu answer me? I want to move this pic to Commons and I need that info in order to do it.Ingsoc 10:26, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

WP:CFD
I've put two categories you created up for deletion here. I'm afraid I don't think them particularly useful, and is not American, at least to my ear. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It would be a courtesy if you would at least read our articles before devising categories for them. There is no such word in American English as Republicanist; and James Madison, one of the founders of the Democratic Republicans, was never a Federalist; Patrick Henry, however, was.  Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Excuse me, Septentrionalis? Should I quote from the articles themselves? Here is a quote from the first part in the article about James Madison: "During and after the war, Madison reversed many of his positions. By 1815, he supported the creation of the second National Bank, a strong military, and a high tariff to protect the new factories opened during the war". These are absolutely, completely Federalist stances, especially the main issue: the National Bank.
 * In the categories about "Federalists" and "Republicanists" I did not refer to the persons' party memberships (Federalist Party or Democratic-Republican Party), but to their ideas and the political acts they performed as a result of those ideas.


 * As to Patrick Henry, I admit I was indeed wrong; He was an Antifederalist and then became Federalist; Hence, he should be in the category "Both".


 * And about the word "Republican" versus "Republicanist": Firstly, "Republican" would mean, to a modern ear, a member or supporter of the present-day Republican Party. Secondly, "Republicanist" is on the same weight as "Federalist". If the word "Federalist" exists, so should "Republicanist". Even if it weren't so, the first reason I mentioned – to save Wikipedia users from utter confusion – is important enough, as I think.
 * Furthermore, an article named "Republicanism in the United States" is alive and kicking. That's exactly the ideology whose supporters are "Republicanists" (surely no one would claim that "Republicans", i.e. supporters of modern Republican Party, do all support "Republicanism").


 * Last words on the entire subject: the Republicanist-Federalist debate was one of the most important ideological conflicts in the history of the United States, the country that later became leader of the world. Issues related to central government's power and to constitutional law still make headlines today. So why not include a category that tells about the Nation's politicians back then and their stand in that crucial debate?! I think it is extremely important. A.R. 08:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Saar5.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Saar5.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 11:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

New SCOTUS categories
Have these new categories been discussed? I don't really have an objection to them, however, I would hate to see a lot of work go to waste. If there hasn't been already, there should probably be a discussion on WP:SCOTUS regarding new categorization schemes. Cheers. --MZMcBride 18:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I have an objection to them: categories like Category:United States Supreme Court cases, June 1950 are far too specific&mdash;there is absolutely no good reason to group by the month they were handed down. Not only will the opinions decided within a month have no more of a relationship to each other than with those handed down the previous or subsequent month, but most months will be very sparsely populated.  Furthermore, inclusion in any of the Category:United States Supreme Court cases by date subcategories will encourage people to remove them from the general Category:United States Supreme Court cases category (which you strangely have avoided integrating your new categories into).  This will make it difficult, if not impossible, to find a case article by browsing (how often do you remember the year, rather than a party name), and alphabetical browsing through the category is absolutely necessary to find an article given the difficulty of remembering case names and dealing with the variations of abbreviations.  It's far better to chronologically organize cases by using list articles, and this is already done in several forms.  See the contents of Category:United States Supreme Court opinions by term, Category:Lists of United States Supreme Court cases (organized by case reporter volume), and Category:Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by court.
 * So please stop making these categories, and stop adding articles to them until this can be discussed on the Supreme Court Wikiproject. I can guarantee that, at a minimum, the month-specific categories will be deleted, so let's talk this out first before any further effort is wasted.  Postdlf 21:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Please discuss further here, at the U.S. Supreme Court WikiProject. Postdlf 22:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps you didn't notice it, but there's already a CFD here. If you have an argument about why they should be kept, that'd be the place to make it. Unless I missed something, you haven't commented about it yet.--Chaser - T 00:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NASA_Shuttle_Landing_Facility_aerial_view.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NASA_Shuttle_Landing_Facility_aerial_view.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~  Wi ki  her mit  02:10, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NASA Shuttle Landing Facility aerial view.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:NASA Shuttle Landing Facility aerial view.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:27, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

RDNA
I restored the speedy tag on RDNA to enable RDNA (disambiguation) to be moved over it. Since there is no primary topic, the disambiguation page should be at the base name. -- JHunterJ 14:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Global Health
Hello, first of all, you need to go here to nominate redirects. Secondly, there's nothing wrong with it. It's a redirect is all. Thanks. Cheers,JetLover (Report a mistake) 23:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Musical notes
Template:Musical notes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.. (There's already Template:Semitones, and the Fixed Do solfege isn't used in most of the English world.) — Torc2 (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Search From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Floaterfluss (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:AN_MPQ-53_radar_(b030310f).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AN_MPQ-53_radar_(b030310f).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Citation on Special K
You've provided a citation for the "Special K" quote, but this seems to be a live concert that you're referring to and not a published source. Do you have a URL you can include for this? If not, then it's more like hearsay that while interesting, would be more appropriate on a fansite or similar place. ^_^ Rachel Summers (talk) 16:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Metropolin
A tag has been placed on Metropolin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado (talk) 21:09, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Truthanado (talk) 21:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Metropolin
A tag has been placed on Metropolin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Spice1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Spice1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Same for File:Spice i.jpg and File:Spice p3.jpg. --Sherool (talk) 19:46, 22 December 2008 (UTC)


 * File:TPS-59_radar.jpg also doesn't have any source info. --Sherool (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Spice i.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Spice i.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:38, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Spice p3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Spice p3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:15, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:P-14_"Tall_King".jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:P-14_"Tall_King".jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:P-14 "Tall King".jpg
Thanks for uploading File:P-14 "Tall King".jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
I created or fleshed out a lot of the articles on Soviet SAMs originally, I'm happy to see that they've been much improved in the last few years and you did a lot of work on them. Good job! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.81.49 (talk) 23:55, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Ludwig_von_Mises,_New_York,_1950.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ludwig_von_Mises,_New_York,_1950.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Placebo
Please take a look at WP:MUSIC to see why some members do not warrant separate articles. Cheers Nouse4aname (talk) 10:25, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Placebo pictures
Hi A.R! Actually I involve myself in developping Placebo related pages on french wikipedia and I've been looking for pictures of Placebo for a while. I've seen you uploaded a picture of Steve Forrest but could you upload it on wikimedia commons so that every wikipedia (not only english) may be able to use it? And if you have other pictures of placebo members, could you upload them too? Thanks a lot, I'd be grateful to you.

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello A.R.! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:08, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Fiona Brice -

Nomination for deletion of Template:Common chords
Template:Common chords has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:31, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Thomas Jefferson portrait.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Thomas Jefferson portrait.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Battle for the Sun, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Battle for the Sun. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. See also WP:ALBUMCAPS --IllaZilla (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Battle for the Sun. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Europe22 (talk) 16:10, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Bill Lloyd listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bill Lloyd. Since you had some involvement with the Bill Lloyd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 05:46, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Firecan


A tag has been placed on Firecan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. K e rowyn Leave a note 02:09, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Pointer (input device)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pointer. -- Trevj (talk) 10:58, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Secretlondon (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Fiona Brice
You assert notability for this musician, can you provide sources which evidence her independent notability under WP:GNG? This has been unsourced for about three years since your statement, and I'm not seeing reliable secondary sources which provide substantial coverage of the artist. --j⚛e deckertalk 20:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Idc eng.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Idc eng.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Quasiballistic missiles
Category:Quasiballistic missiles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger One ping only 19:00, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

WCIP listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect WCIP. Since you had some involvement with the WCIP redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Revolution1221 (talk · email · contributions) 03:12, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loud Like Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Lloyd (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of AN/ASQ-119 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AN/ASQ-119 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AN/ASQ-119 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Puffin  Let's talk! 15:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urthecast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Loud Like Love (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Title track (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

קפיטליזם listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect קפיטליזם. Since you had some involvement with the קפיטליזם redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 23:51, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

ניטשה listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ניטשה. Since you had some involvement with the ניטשה redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:32, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

כלבת listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect כלבת. Since you had some involvement with the כלבת redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 21:37, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Million Little Pieces (single).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:A Million Little Pieces (single).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

שוורצנגר listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect שוורצנגר. Since you had some involvement with the שוורצנגר redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Cut and paste moves
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of Gravitational-wave observations a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into List of gravitational wave observations. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. 70.51.201.102 (talk) 05:04, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Loud Like Love (song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loud Like Love (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Loud Like Love (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 04:43, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I don't really care which way this goes...
... but at the Planck units article your edit has space deletion undone by this edit. I dunno what the WP:MOS says about this. Just don't want the two of you wasting time undoing each others' work. 71.184.228.118 (talk) 21:38, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

Interwiki
See WP:INTERWIKI. Those should be added to wikidata instead. See Help:Interwiki_linking and WP:ILL in particular. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 21:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Jesus' Son (song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jesus' Son (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jesus' Son (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 00:36, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Loud Like Love (song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loud Like Love (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Loud Like Love (song)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FamblyCat94 (talk) 00:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

The Lost Jewel of Orion listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Lost Jewel of Orion. Since you had some involvement with the The Lost Jewel of Orion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pam D  15:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Lost Jewel of Orion listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lost Jewel of Orion. Since you had some involvement with the Lost Jewel of Orion redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pam D  15:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Your edit to Rest Mass
Hi, you manually undid my edit on Rest Mass in this edit, without giving any reasons. Would you mind explaining your reasoning behind this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EduardoW (talk • contribs) 15:48, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

File source problem with File:FIRECAN.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:FIRECAN.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 01:57, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

"גלובליזציה" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect גלובליזציה. Since you had some involvement with the גלובליזציה redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 13:16, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Planck acceleration


The article Planck acceleration has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "A trivial bit of dimensional analysis, and a term not actually used in the physics literature to a sufficient extent to merit a dedicated article (mostly a viXra topic more than anything else)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XOR&#39;easter (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

"ליקר" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect ליקר. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 00:25, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

"Ν particle" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ν particle. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

"קוניאק" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect קוניאק and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Quick Quokka [⁠talk • contribs] 14:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

"אנטי-גלובליזציה" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect אנטי-גלובליזציה and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Quick Quokka [⁠talk • contribs] 14:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

"אדמת" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect אדמת and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Quick Quokka [⁠talk • contribs] 14:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

"פירנצה" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect פירנצה and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Quick Quokka [⁠talk • contribs] 14:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

"בולוניה" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect בולוניה and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Quick Quokka [⁠talk • contribs] 14:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

"ספגטי בולונז" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ספגטי בולונז and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Quick Quokka [⁠talk • contribs] 14:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

"בק"ש" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect בק& and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 14 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 17:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AN/APR-9


The article AN/APR-9 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

"אגוטיזם" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect אגוטיזם and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 27 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 19:32, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Category:Ongoing legal cases has been nominated for deletion
Category:Ongoing legal cases has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QueenofBithynia (talk) 18:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

"Microrad" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microrad&redirect=no Microrad] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. fgnievinski (talk) 05:19, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Movement protein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)