User talk:A09/Archive

Welcome!
  Hello, !  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Find a task to help improve Wikipedia.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first — it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes ( ~ ), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 10:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Slavko Špan
Hi. Please note that another Wikipedia is NOT a reliable source (see WP:CIRC). The date of death on the sl wiki is unsourced too. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 19:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi! Yeah, I am fully aware of this guideline. Also because of this reference circulation I did not add slwiki as a source (BTW, I would never do) Will add sources as they come. At least I hope. Sincerely, --A09090091 (talk) 19:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)


 * No worries. I can't find anything obvious with a quick search to WP:V a date of death. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 07:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I think it is important to keep articles on interwikis updated, because it is not impossible about leaving date of death on XX wiki whilst on enwiki is noted. --A09090091 (talk) 13:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

IP Messager:
Hi sir can talk to you...
 * Yeah, sure. Are there any problems?--A09090091 (talk) 12:11, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Recent death
This template is not used everytime someone dies, it is not meant to confirm or advertize the death itself. As the templates guideline states Do not use it merely to tag the article of a recently deceased person, as that is not the template's purpose. Thank you, -  FlightTime  ( open channel ) 17:52, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * IDK how could you say "Activities level has stabilized" after more than 100 edits. Whatever. A09090091 (talk) 19:17, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Draft speedy deletion
Just for your information, A7 does not apply to drafts(or any of the criteria that starts with an A); I deleted it as promotional(G11). 331dot (talk) 10:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @331dot: Thanks for knowing me. A09090091 (talk) 10:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Reversion
Hi there. What, please, was the purpose of this reversion, for which you left no edit summary? I am concerned that it may have been a mistake. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 13:53, 21 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: I thought it was a name. If it was a good-faith edit, then I apologize. English is my second language, so my mistakes are not uncommon. A09090091 (talk) 19:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Fair enough and thanks! It wasn't a great edit anyway but I have redone it to make it work a little bit better. Here are Willson's lovely instruments!. Cheers DBaK (talk) 22:49, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: Thanks for the link and your understanding. Every warning makes my anti-vandalism goals better. A09090091 (talk) 23:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Reply to you
Excuse me editor or something that refers to you, Why did you meddle my contributions and reverted it? It is based on evidences and a factual also I’m a citizen of the country that is in content so I’m truely sure on what I write there so please don’t revert ite ever again ( pertaining to filipino invention, the one you reverted) Akoayz 3 (talk) 17:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Akoayz 3 Hi. First, please don't think that I'm having an agenda of being anti-smth. You wrote: "I’m a citizen of the country that is in content so I’m truely sure on what I write there so please don’t revert ite ever again": this is irrelevant, because sources must be cited along with what you write. Everything must be backedup with sources. This is one of five pillows of every Wikimedia project. I didn't see any sources, except if the link given on bottom was. Can you please clarify your sources, that are maybe better than a what-it-seems a blog? Thanks. A09090091 (talk) 19:45, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry to butt in but I must say that I absolutely love the concept here of five pillows. It is an excellent idea and I strongly agree that we should all have at least five pillows. I do wonder, though, if in fact you might have meant the Five pillars which are sadly not quite the same thing? :) With all good wishes DBaK (talk) 09:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered: Haha, thank you. I had the right thing in mind, but typed the wrong one. Lapsus, and this is a big one. On the other hand, pillow supports your head while sleeping, so I guess it can be a pillar too. A09090091 (talk) 17:43, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Very true! And thank you for the Lapsus link, which I enjoyed. Cheers DBaK (talk) 23:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

You deleted an edit I made
You sent me this message. I am not used to editing wikipedia articles so maybe my justification wasn't posted. In short, the referendum was cancelled. Since it is no longer relevent, it should be removed from the page. Thanks

"Hello, I'm A09090091. I noticed that in this edit to 2022 Quebec general election, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A09090091 (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2022 (UTC)" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.154.79 (talk)


 * Hi, I think the page shouldn't be emptied as you did but rather modeled to tell that it is irelevant now. Maybe I didn't post the right message to your talkpage, sorry for this inconvenience.--A09090091 (talk) 08:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Reversion
Hello, about the missing information template, it was a mistake, I didn't detect that they were tagged as Stubs. About the article of TECH Technological University I removed tempplates following the instructions of Help:Maintenance template removal. In this article (Section "When to remove") there are some circumstances when a template can be removed. Specifically, the article meets the following circumstances:

1. When the issue has been adequately addressed;

2. Upon determining that the issue has been resolved (perhaps by someone else);

4. When an article talkpage discussion has not been initiated (for templates requesting it);

7. If the maintenance template is of a type that requires support but is not fully supported. Strongly recommend that the tagging editor initiate a discussion (generally on the article's talk page) to support the placement of the tag. '''If the tagging editor failed to do so, or the discussion is dormant, and there is no other support for the template, it can be removed; '''

You can see that when the templates were added the user didn't start a talkpage discussion. In spite of that, I asked him about how to improve it. The answer wasn't specific, so I decided to edit most of the article. I had been working in the article, adding new references and improving the redaction as well as other users. So, the issue has been adequately addressed and, moreover, don't exist any talkpage discussion about it. So please, don't revert it again.

I would like to thank you for the information about te Stubs Tags. --Luisgonzalez74 (talk) 11:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Luisgonzalez74: Hi, sorry for inconvenient revert with COI tags. Stub or (in this case) nanostub tags are placed on the very bottom of such pages (or should be placed). Thank you too for informing me on my mistake and a harsh message on your talkapge.
 * PS: Next time try to keep discussions on one page, so simply reply on your talkpage and inform the messenger with ie. Ping template. A09090091 (talk) 11:56, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Don't worry. I have learned something new about the Stub tags. Thank you for informing me about my mistakes and your understanding about the university's article. Next time I will answer in the same discusion talk haha. Cheers. --Luisgonzalez74 (talk) 12:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag from my article (Techno Group of Institutions). The article is not promotional. Thanks in advance Adex02 (talk) 11:43, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do this ASAP, I can't afford retyping the article for the 1000th time Adex02 (talk) 11:44, 18 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Adex02: Page has failed WP:N criteria. You may also read WP:COI policy. A09090091 (talk) 19:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)