User talk:A123soup

November 2016
Hello, I'm AffeL. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to The Walking Dead (season 7)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - AffeL (talk) 01:34, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, add false information, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Walking Dead (season 7), you may be blocked from editing. - AffeL (talk) 16:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Again with the disruptive editing. By adding false information to The Walking Dead (season 7). And you are not supposed to add viewership up. Those are live viewership for one viewing. If you keep this up you will get reported to an admin and get blocked from editing. - AffeL (talk) 18:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Again, Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out, change or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Walking Dead (season 7), you may be blocked from editing. - AffeL (talk) 10:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello
We don't use "Live+3" to determine how many people watch an episode on Wikipedia. We use only live rating. We don't add ratings togheter. You will be reverted if you do this by different user and if you keep this up, you will be blocked. - AffeL (talk) 19:38, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Answering your comment on my talk page: That's not how Wikipedia works.. you don't add ratings togheter. We don't do that. That does not make any sense what so ever. In the table we just put the live same day rating. That is just how it is man. - AffeL (talk) 10:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on United States presidential election, 2016. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 10:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 10:18, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Again November 2016
Again, Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out, change or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to United States presidential election, 2016, you may be blocked from editing. - AffeL (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced content
I notice that several times you have added significant amounts of content without any sourcing. Please don't do that. We are not allowed to use Wikipedia like our own blog or website. All content must be sourced properly. -- BullRangifer (talk) 06:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)