User talk:A20202020

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions&#32;so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply  [ create a named account] . It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:
 * Create new pages and rename pages
 * Edit semi-protected pages
 * Upload images
 * Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

Note that in order for the first three features to be available, you must have had an account for a minimum number of days and made a minimum number of edits.

If you edit without using a named account, your IP address (A20202020) is used to identify you instead.

I hope that you, as a Wikipedian, decide to continue contributing to our project: an encyclopedia of human knowledge that anyone can edit. If you need help, check out Questions, or you can  to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;).

Happy editing! — Paleo Neonate  – 06:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Fine tuned universe
I noticed your participation there. It is uncertain what paper you were recently proposing, although I have noticed "It can be solved by using Bayesian theory testing" in a previous edit. Mathematical models can indeed describe anything logical and seemingly perfect. It is a very different thing to begin testing the model against reality (testing hypotheses, etc). In science, a collection of facts built using tested hypotheses eventually allow the formation of a theory, a model that explains the current knowledge and attempts to make it practical (making predictions, etc). The other way around, starting by making an idealized model, is unlikely to match observations of nature. It is however normal for systems that developped over time dependent of other conditions to sometimes give the impression of design at first (i.e. enthropic principle). Since Wikipedia talk pages are not a forum, I will however stop here. Happy editing, — Paleo Neonate  – 06:55, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your help. Actually particular paper I want to mention is not exactly about Bayesian testing theory, but I find other paper in which by systematic comparison of different hypothesis, author has gives comprehensive information on fine tuning. It is published by academic source. With your permission, I would like to give you link to paper which you can review? A20202020 (talk) 13:31, 29 December 2019 (UTC)