User talk:A21sauce/Archive 1

Go-ongers
Never do this again. You completely destroyed the formatting of the entire article, removed a ton of Japanese text for no reason only to put it in a section at the bottom of the article for reasons I don't understand, which included removing nearly every instance of Nihongo on the article and put the items in nihongo in the wrong order. I've undone everything you've done to the article because, to put it bluntly, you fucked it up big time.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 02:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi Ryulong. No person who is not familiar with at least 2nd year Japanese can get through this article or want to go NEART it. (Even someone who has will want to be paid to read it.) The translations break down any kind of flow in reading. It is sloppy writing. I think other editors would agree with me on this. Are you paid by Bandai, the Monbusho or something? And even if you were, What's with the rudeness?Aichikawa (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)AIchikawa
 * There are no translations in this article. It's all the Japanese text that is directly related to the text of the article. This includes character names, item names, robot names, etc. I was rude because you clearly knew what you were doing, you completely disrupted the formatting of the page, and you do not know how the templates that are used work. You do not take every single instance of Japanese text and remove it to a section at the bottom of an article, and then just leave the romanized versions of that text in the article. Before you do this to another article, read WP:MOS-JA.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 21:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The only thing that might be done is to change most of them to nihongo2 to remove most of the little question marks. Other than that, all the Japanese needs to remain, as Ryūlóng stated, per WP:MOS-JA. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

I disagree. The format gives you 3+ pronunciations/translations for every proper noun in the story. Formatting does not equal writing. --Aichikawa (talk) 20:44, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

Tim Zagat
Hi, I like your changes to the writing of Tim Zagat, generally, since it improved the flow of the writing, and it reads better. I appreciate your revision in this regard. Generally try to use inline references; single-pointer references are better than nothing, but inline references are preferred. Click to edit this text here, and you can see the basic reference template (copy it and paste it to your text processor; and use it in future). Just fill in the spaces to the right of the = sign with the proper sources (such as urls, title, author's name, publication, etc.) Also, one other thing: (some in Wikipedia feel the NNDB source is not ideal and should be avoided.) About removing chunks of the "close call" -- why did you do this? I know what happened at the movie theater that night -- I was Zagat's rescuer -- but he never bothered to thank me even though I risked my life to save his. Just letting you know that the details of the encounter are accurate. And keep up the good work!.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

If you use the same reference again, you don't have to put the whole thing in; just do this:--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Notice the slanted line to the right of the word here; that slanted line is important.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Here's a long shell in case you ever need it:

Good luck!--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Generally, I like your writing choices in Tim Zagat, as I said.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * About the incident: in the Paramount movie way back in 1989, in the middle of Dances With Wolves, I heard a fight break out. I looked to my left and saw somebody tall (the movie theater was dark) apparently having a fistfight. I had no idea that it was a knifing (the thought hadn't even occurred to me -- again, everything happened suddenly). There were (I think) two aisles in the theater -- a left side aisle, and a right-side aisle, if one is facing the screen. I had been sitting with my fiancee across the right-side aisle from Zagat (Zagat had been sitting on the right-side aisle, but on the left side of this aisle). I helped break up the apparent fistfight by coming from behind the closest person (apparently the probably drug-addicted guy stabbing Zagat) and wrapped my arms around him, and locking my wrists, immobilizing him. This technique had been done to me when I was at Andover, during a basketball game -- a smaller kid had immobilized me using the same technique. So, the big guy and me are kind of locked together, vertically, with me from behind him, hugging his backside, with wrists locked, and I locked in his large arms. He couldn't move his arms. So, the fistfight stopped. I had hoped other moviegoers would help me subdue either of the two parties (since I thought the other guy was party to the fistfight too), but nobody helped, the picture kept rolling, and I realized I had wrapped my arms around a burly big guy who was perhaps 6 inches taller than me, and the two of us (me and the attacker) wobbled towards the front of the movie theater in a kind of weird dance. I was afraid to let him go (otherwise he might wrestle me or hit me and he'd probably be able to beat me pretty badly because of the size difference) so I really didn't know what to do. We wobbled almost to the front of the screen, perhaps for twenty seconds or so. I looked at other movie goers faces (I could see them from the light from the picture) and they gaped, confused. Sometime during the struggle my glasses fell off. I said "please help me get this guy" but they just sat there. Then, the drug-addicted guy yelled "LET ME GO!" and it was such a loud, guttural cry, that it scared me even more, and -- I let him go. I was intimidated. LUCKILY for me, the homeless guy ran out, across the front of the screen, to the basement exit (on the left most side of the screen). If he had wanted to, he could have turned around and stabbed me and I'd be dead. (And you wouldn't be reading this.) I found my glasses somehow (or somebody handed them to me? I don't remember now) and I tried to watch the rest of the movie, with broken glasses (bent frames). After the movie ended, exiting the movie theater, a lawyer took my name down; a few weeks later a lawyer's assistant took a detailed statement from me about the incident. A few weeks after that, I got a call from a lawyer saying what had happened -- knifing, semi-famous person (who?) Zagat (who?) the guy who does the restaurant reviews (oh, Zagat) that the attacker got caught (3 days later).--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * So, putting things together, perhaps the reason nobody helped me was perhaps they saw the knife (it wasn't recovered from the theater apparently) and I didn't see the knife, which perhaps the homeless guy had been holding the entire time we were wobbling to the screen. Sheesh. So, I got even more scared in retrospect. A few years past that, I phoned Zagat, who put me on hold for the longest time; when I finally got through, he said "I don't want to talk about it" and hung up on me. No thank you. No nothing. No acknowledgement. Zilch. So, it's always bothered me that perhaps I risked my life to save an ungrateful guy (or do I deserve any sympathy here? since I didn't know that I had been risking my life?). And all I wanted from Zagat was some kind of thank you, but in time, in my own way, through studying philosophy (like Spinoza) I see it's all cause-and-effect, and I forgive everybody, although it still irks me that I never got a "thank you".--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * But, the reason for the overly detailed description was to possibly get Zagat to read the account. He'd know I was right, since all the details matched up. The newspaper didn't record exactly where he had been sitting -- I knew. So, I figured that the only person who would know that my account was accurate was Zagat himself.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * So, sometimes I suspect, with (1) your interest in this not super-famous person, when most people are not interested, and (2) your writing skill (Zagat's a competent writer from editing the restaurant guides with pithy synopses) and (3) your interest in Wikipedia seems to have begun after my revisions of the TZ Wikipedia article, and (4) Zagat hadn't wanted to rehash the account (perhaps it was a painful memory?) and you, with your edits, are also reducing the description. These four things, taken together, make me wonder whether you and Zagat are the same person.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * But that was my motivation for being overly detailed; I encourage you to put the detailed account back in. :)--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * But all this stuff is highly interesting to me, since I had been working on a book at the time, but reading heavily into philosophy. I'm a handyman, but I've also been a market researcher. The thinking, over time, led me to write a book about preventing terrorism, which I'm not allowed to tout in Wikipedia (and I believe in Wikipedia's rules) but if you're half smart, by googling my last name (sulcer), it's easily found on Amazon. And I offer free pdf copies to anybody who emails me (my email is on my user page). But, seen in a different light, the whole incident, in my mind, was terrorism. The attacker was a terrorist. Moviegoers not responding -- that's related (fear of "getting involved"); drugs, or lack thereof (which may have caused the weird guy to go nuts -- possibly a drug-addicted guy needing more drugs, not getting any, and getting angry about it) which leads to all sorts of interesting conclusions, if you think about it. But, in a weird way, the incident was helpful for me, in the sense that it was one of many events in my life which helped crystallize my thinking about an important topic.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Best,
 * tom--Tomwsulcer (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

homosexual v. gay
Thanks for taking the time to write to me about this usage. I have not a deep level of knowledge on the subject matter, and appreciate the feedback, and the fact that you have had an opportunity to look over the article since its clean-up. Regards, --Diannaa (talk) 22:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

I likewise appreciate the feedback, but have no clue what you are talking about. Rich Farmbrough, 21:36, 20 January 2010 (UTC).

Bridget Irish
In response to your question from a few weeks ago, the article deleted per AFD consensus; if you want it restored, you have to write a draft in userspace that demonstrates that an article that complies with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines can be written on the subject (e.g. verifiability, notability), and then present it at WP:DRV.  Maxim (talk)  21:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Spot check of Greg and Karen DeSanto
Hello, I spot-checked the article Greg and Karen DeSanto and found several minor flaws which I corrected. In a list, you add commas after all list items except for the last. For example, you would write: "Tom, Jane, Joe, and Bill ran in the race." not "Tom, Jane, Joe and Bill ran in the race." The other issue (very minor) is you don't include the period at the end of a sentence in an italicized section (like book title Star Saves the Circus). You can look at this diff to see what changes I made. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:26, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Edmund Ser, Malaysian Fashion Designer
Hi, came across your interest in fashion in the Guild. Would like to ask for your help to copy edit an article about a Malaysian Fashion Designer, Edmund Ser. It is a biography about his early life, how he achieved his success and such. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Ser Thank you! Asiareports (talk) 04:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Malaysian Fashion Designer
Hi, came across your interest in fashion in the Guild. Would like to ask for your help to copy edit an article about a Malaysian Fashion Designer, Edmund Ser. It is a biography about his early life, how he achieved his success and such. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Ser Thank you! Asiareports (talk) 04:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE requests page
Hi

Can you please restrict yourself to putting "working" on only one article at a time please.

Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 15:34, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You can either leave it and the Gnomes will come out after dark and deal with it, or you can delete it and add it to the archive.
 * TO add it to the archive, you erase that section, go to the archive page, edit the month section (that it was posted as a request) and hopefully someone will have put your name underneath the article link with a single gap between the requesting editors name and your name. In that gap you put the date you finished the copyedit, in this case July 05, and then save. The parameters you need to update are (in bold):


 * Request posted date
 * Article link The article title
 * User name of requestor ( User:Requestorsname )br/>
 * Date copedit completed
 * User that copyedited User:Yourname
 * Notes (for GA etc.)


 * Chaosdruid (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Please try and remember to update the requests archive page once you have deleted the article from the requests page (see instructions above: "go to the archive page"). Chaosdruid (talk) 03:22, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank You!
Many Thanks for helping. Wish all the best for you!--George Talk 05:35, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Human rights in Egypt under the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces
Thanks in advance for your help copy editing of the article. I have another request though. I was hoping that you will try to expand the "Virginity testing" section. thanks :-) -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 07:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your notice :-) Loai was just released few hours ago but he still could go back. Rasha still could go to jail. But I will work on updating the article in the next few days. Thanks again for you help copy editing of the article. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 01:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ramy Fakhry was killed by the army but there has been other but they are nameless and not enough on them; you can read the EL for more info. I wish I had the time to work on the article but Im super busy organizing with some activists in Egypt plus work and school so I looking for someone to help me with any of the articles about the Egyptian revolution so please let me know if you are free and can help with any of them -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 06:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

This Is It
Thanks for doing another copyedit. But I've kinda thrown in towel with trying it for FA. Crystal Clear x3 03:45, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE May-July numbers
Matter resolved, hopefully to your satisfaction :¬)

Please try and ensure that you keep the drive page totals up-to-date, completing them two months later is not really a satisfactory situation. What would have happened if you were in the top 5 on the leaderboard? We would have had to start taking awards away from people!

We do appreciate that problems can occur without warning though, as I found out when my motherboard blew up leaving me without a computer for six weeks. Chaosdruid (talk) 14:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

May awards (a little belatedly)
All's well that ends well :¬) I have also updated your roll-over total on the July drive page. Chaosdruid (talk) 14:43, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

S&M
Thanks for c/e S&M, leave me a message on my talk page when you have finished :). Calvin  &bull; Na Na Na  C'mon!  00:59, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Act on National Flag and Anthem (Japan)
I thank you for making copyedits to this article; I also answered some of the questions you had in the article. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:34, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I was still copyediting but that's fine. So you'll see some more queries. Things I needed further clarification that couldn't be put into a one-word edit recommendation:
 * 1) "Provisions of the flag" section, last sentence. Could we have examples of the shades of red that they named?
 * 2)"Kimigayo" before 1999 section, towards the end: There is mention of an unpopular 1869 version of the anthem. a) Could we have some description of it and explanation perhaps of why it was unpopular? b) the reference attributed there, a Japan Online article, doesn't tell you so you need new references.
 * 3) "Party Positions: The Democratic Party of Japan": "that the bill would cause further divisions among society and the public schools". Did you mean "that the bill would cause further divisions BETWEEN society and the public schools" or just "further divisions within society"?
 * 4) "Reactions: International": I really feel that we could use some specific examples here otherwise everything seems based on rumor.
 * --Aichikawa (talk) 15:27, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The shades of red are listed at the Flag of Japan article from the various sources; I only wanted to cover here what was mentioned in the law itself. The link is above the text.
 * Brought over reasons why, mostly lacked a certain tone to it.
 * Parts of society believed the schools are not teaching the children to be good citizens and to be good Japanese.
 * I own the sources used in the article and I been trying really hard to find anything from the countries involved. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 17:33, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll try to help with the last point this week.--Aichikawa (talk) 14:43, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, sorry for butting in :¬)
 * I have removed the article from the GOCE requests page. I realise that there may be a few points still to answer, but 1, 2 and 4 are editing rather than copy-editing. Also the archive has already been filled in as completed on 9 August.
 * Can I also point out that it might be better to leave this sort of thing on the article talk page? There are two reasons for this - 1. They can be addressed by editors other than just the two that know about this discussion thread, as regular editors of the page will not know about it, and 2. If anyone comes along to do an FAR/GAR or peer review, they can see your notes and check to see if they have been addressed. Chaosdruid (talk) 10:21, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Considering that this article is pretty much a one-man show (me) everything here was addressed. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 11:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You just put "Talk:" in front of the article title.
 * I normally make a section with a GOCE title, such as this one. Chaosdruid (talk) 20:42, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kidel by Simon Keitch.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kidel by Simon Keitch.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Dead link in article 'Golbarg Bashi'
Hi. The article 'Golbarg Bashi' has a dead link that could not be repaired automatically. Can you help fix it?

Dead: http://www.payvand.com/news/06/mar/1067.htm This link is marked with Dead link in the article. Please take a look at that article and fix what you can. Thank you!
 * You added this in July 2011.
 * The bot tested this link on 29 March, 31 March, 2 April and yesterday, but it never worked.
 * The bot checked The Wayback Machine and WebCite but couldn't find a suitable replacement.

PS- you can opt-out of these notifications by adding to your user page or user talk page. BlevintronBot (talk) 17:44, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * }

Kitten
What a nice surprise! Thank you! I'm glad I could help. INeverCry  21:40, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Newark notables and lack of sources
Your recent edits to the article List of people from Newark, New Jersey added six individuals to the list, but did not provide any sources for any of these individuals. It is absolutely imperative that all material added to all Wikipedia articles provide reliable and verifiable sources to support the claims made. I presume that you have some basis for making these additions, but please be sure that all future edits are accompanied by the required sources. Alansohn (talk) 02:22, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Patrik-Ian Polk
Hi. Thanks for contributing to the GOCE drive. I've just checked Patrik-Ian Polk, which you recently copy edited, and found a few more things that needed doing to it. Please would you take a look at my further copy edit. A couple of key points there are: we generally try to neutralise puffery, conceit and other flowery language. Unsubstantiated boasts are best removed altogether. We only use family names after the first occurrence, and it's good to use "he", "him", "his", rather than the actual name where it's clear who we're referring to, to avoid monotony. Kind regards, --Stfg (talk) 23:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree your additional changes were merited, and now I know abut the preference for using the third person but I also did alot of copyediting. Who gets credit for editing this, thanks--Aichikawa (talk) 17:22, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You absolutely get the credit. My work was part of the routine reviewing we do on drives, which isn't to claim credit, and not intended to detract from your contribution. I hope the comments were useful. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 19:59, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * They totally were. thanks!--Aichikawa (talk) 17:32, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Use of GOCEinuse
Hi. Please put GOCEinuse on articles only when you plan to start work on them immediately, and not just to reserve them for later editing, as you appear to have done at Tiger from Tjampa and Teardrops... Doing that may have the result of delaying the copy edit of those articles, if someone else was ready to do them. Thanks. --Stfg (talk) 13:40, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, won't do again (sheepish smile icon here)--Aichikawa (talk) 13:51, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
 * No worries. Take your pick from Template:Smiley3. --Stfg (talk) 14:05, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

PPACA edit
I am confused by your addition of "the speed of" to the PPACA lead. I skimmed the citations and didn't find where it is mentioned, and I don't know how laws have "speed". Please clarify. Thanks.Thomas Pain 67 (talk) 15:28, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, will put up back up soon. --Aichikawa (talk) 16:09, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Joan Juliet Buck
Just because you do not like someone politics does not merit the materials removal, it just speaks badly of you. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard&pe=1&#Joan_Juliet_Buck IPWAI (talk) 07:39, 9 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, Aichikawa. I've responded to your post on my talk page. Scolaire (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

HA Schult
As you are a professional artist and seem to have much experience in writing articles, may I ask you for a third opinion on Talk:HA Schult? There is a content dispute on HA Schult. One editor frequently removes what I have written, although I think that all was well sourced. Here are some diffs:      Wikiwiserick (talk) 20:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Joan Juliet Buck
You are not allowed to delete properly sourced information, like you are doing here. 78.100.53.5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm supposed to take you seriously? You're an anonymous IP address.--Aichikawa (talk) 12:47, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Joan Juliet Buck
I added another reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.133.214.66 (talk) 19:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Obviously you have more sockets — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.133.214.66 (talk) 07:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Hello, I'm Veriss1. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Talk:Asma al-Assad that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Veriss (talk) 16:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:MarkKidelbySimonKeitch.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:MarkKidelbySimonKeitch.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Tricia McLaughlin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! CharmlessCoin (talk) 19:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Lowell Hawthorne
Hello, Aichikawa. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lowell Hawthorne, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)