User talk:A21sauce/Archive 3

Colin Farrell
Hi

I am afraid I am not around much until the beginning of February, but after a quick look at the article, there are a few things that may be easily fixed. If I was to prepare an article for GA status, I would go through the GA & FA checklists and try and get it a little higher than the GA minimum. It is easy to see what is required to take it from a GA to an FA and to put some of those things in here can only aid in gaining a GA.

For example, take one thing which often crops up, images and the "alt=" parameter. At GA an image is required to have the alt= parameter present, but not completed, while at FA it is to be completed. It is easy enough to fill it in while add the alt= param.

Some ref material:
 * Good article criteria - What is expected
 * What_the_Good_article_criteria_are_not - additional info
 * Reviewing_good_articles - how the article is measured by a reviewer
 * Manual_of_Style_(biographies) - specific MoS for the article

After looking at these, the next step is doing a thorough copy-edit against MoS. Always try and use the project specific for additional criteria and variations to MoS. Here it would be the biographies MoS (link above).

If you are new to GA nominations, take a look at my first attempt (Talk:Belitung_shipwreck), and rest assured that it is normal to have that sort of attention to detail from the reviewer - especially if you get a good one!

I will try and give it a more thorough going over tonight or tomorrow, and probably do a copyedit, though I am a little rusty so it may be a little slow :¬) Chaosdruid (talk) 21:11, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much, Chaosdruid!! You get a cat;)--Aichik (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Apologies - An unfortunate RL event took me away for a while, but if you still want me to I could give it a going over tonight. Chaosdruid (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries. I haven't had time to even read your links. You know what, I'd appreciate you two cents on this instead.

GOCE blitz
Hi Aichik. I'm very sorry, but the February blitz is for requests, not tagged articles. Analytical feminism and Anna Banana don't qualify for it, I'm afraid. --Stfg (talk) 08:59, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * No prob. Will know for next time! Thanks, Stfg for your work--Aichik (talk) 22:00, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring on Beyoncé Knowles
You were just blocked for edit warring and your first edit once unblocked that relates to this article was to revert someone, the very act that got you blocked to begin with. I was already at the page to block you for one week, and decided to extend one tiny piece of rope instead. I've full protected the article. Since the material you are wanting to add is BLP related and highly contentious, and the sources you are using are yahoo blogs, you need to get a consensus first, and properly source it. I've reverted it back to the previous state. Once the protection expires, if you go and blind revert without a proper consensus, you will be blocked. This should be viewed as a final warning. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 19:19, 25 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Wrote on your page. Look at my referenceS more carefully: Jennie completely mischaracterized that edit and the older one too. I had TWO references on it: Yahoo and Vibe magazine. Vibe is not a blog.--Aichik (talk) 19:49, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You asserted a WP:BLP had copied from 3 artists, failing to provide sources for 2. It's as simple as that, Aichik. —User:JennKR | ☎ 19:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Doesn't forgive you for the fact of completely ignoring my second reference. Talk about biased.--Aichik (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As I said on my talk page, I don't care about the content, it is the behavior that is the problem. Your mistake was returning to the exact same behavior that got you blocked, reverting before discussing.   Dennis Brown - 2¢  - © - @ - Join WER 20:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to you let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You do not need to participate; however, you are invited to help find a resolution. The thread is "Beyonce Knowles, Talk:Beyonce Knowles". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  operator /  talk  21:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Finished work now. Will deal with this tomorrow. --Aichik (talk) 01:16, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Will attend to as soon as I can. Thanks.--Aichik (talk) 19:58, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hello, they closed it after you didn't participate within the week, but they have it archived here. Thanks —JennKR | ☎ 20:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

GA reviewer recruitment
Hi Aichik,

Thanks for signing up at WikiProject Good articles/Recruitment Centre to be a reviewer; you're the Centre's first volunteer and hopefully will be its first graduate! I've created a page here to give a centralized point for our discussion; drop by whenever you have a chance.

Thanks, and I'll look forward to talking further with you soon, Khazar2 (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Since you haven't responded, I'm going to assume you're not interested at this time and close the training page. If you should change your mind in the future, though, just let me know. Cheers, and happy editing, -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

re Colin Farrell GA review
Were you able to get to this? How did it go? --Aichik (talk) 23:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, Aichik, dealing with some health issues but will get to it soon. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:23, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Colin Farrell
The article Colin Farrell you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Colin Farrell for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of Cirt -- 20:56, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Tom Simpson

 * Hi, Minispolid. Long time, no speak. I put in a request for Colin Farrell to be edited, not Tom Simpson. There's been some kind of mix-up. thanks--Aichik (talk) 00:59, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Not according to this. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's totally weird. I didn't type in Tom Simpson, I swear to God. The text below I wrote for Colin Farrell, I'd wondered what happened to that request. He gets a bunch of trolls, so maybe one hit my request? Anyway, do I need to resubmit onto the GOCE page?--Aichik (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Well I don't know what happened, and God's busy at the moment, but the edit does appear to have originated from your account. Might you account have been compromised? If so, you should at the very least change your password. Feel free to request a c/e of Colin Farrell on the requests page if you wish. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 23:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * As much as we all appreciate your work, Baffle gab, your tone towards me on this has been completely unnecessary. Your expression of glee upon finding the link that showed that the Tom Simpson article originated from my account even though I had expressly shown confusion about it, already broke one of the four tenets of editing which is to assume good faith on the part of editors. I would have let that go but then you had to reply to my response with your sarcastic "God's busy at the moment"? Is there something personal between us? If not, are you trying to make it personal? Because when an editor gave you some strawberries on your Talk page writing "I thank God countless times that i came across such a wonderful and polite copy-editor." (sic) you withheld any comment about his use of "God" there, and I'm the agnostic. Just a reminder to assume good faith, but if you can't, at least be consistent. You will eliminate most non-textual or -coding problems by being polite. thanks!!--Aichik (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry I offended you, Aichik. I presented the diff with no glee, I genuinely wondered whether your account had been compromised or used without your permission. Yes I could have phrased that better and I'm sorry. I'm agnostic too - so no offence was intended. Again, sorry. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:38, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I needed to hear that.--Aichik (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

GOCE copy-edit of Persecution of Biharis in Bangladesh
Hi Aichik, what's the status of the GOCE copy-edit for the above article? Your last edit to the article was at 21:25 GMT on 25 August 2013‎, and you haven't marked it done on the requests page. Can you please let us know whether the request is completed so it can be be archived, left alone or returned to the list for another editor to work on? Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 * See my note there. I've also emailed the requesting editor who is on a Wiki-break.--Aichik (talk) 11:42, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Noted; thanks for the update. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 21:39, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've finished the copyedit, but don't know why you tagged cited material. Especially for GANs (the bar for FACs is considerably higher), our job as copyeditors is to polish the prose (not overhaul the article :-)). The tags you used are meant for uncited material, and this article is well-cited. All the best,  Mini  apolis  00:01, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I was trying to get it to make more sense and may have overreached. Thanks for taking care of it.--Aichik (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I know, trying to get articles to make sense can be a bear :-). Thanks for your help with the requests (and in the drive) and all the best,  Mini  apolis  02:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Marilyn Mosley


A tag has been placed on Marilyn Mosley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. red dog six (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Nope, I don't think the page should be deleted and I've contested it. Thanks.--Aichik (talk) 23:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Carraher concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Patrick Carraher, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Million Award
The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robyn Karney
Hello, Aichik. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Robyn Karney, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Sulfurboy (talk) 06:48, 22 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay, responded on article talk page. thanks--Aichik (talk) 19:43, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Note to self
Deal with sourcing in Colin Farrell article.--Aichik (talk) 16:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Amy Winehouse
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amy Winehouse you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- 14:41, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Amy Winehouse
The article Amy Winehouse you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Amy Winehouse for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- 17:23, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Million Award
Congrats on winning a second one of these so soon! You're moving into very elite company... keep up the good work!

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 17:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Mathilde Blind (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Character, Epic and Antiquity --Aichik (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Alexandra Gallitzin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Mason
 * Reverted back. Not sure which one the original writers meant.--Aichik (talk) 19:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Sharon Bridgforth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Folktale --Aichik (talk) 19:09, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 12 Years a Slave (film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 12 Years a Slave (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 23:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 12 Years a Slave (film)
The article 12 Years a Slave (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:12 Years a Slave (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 08:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Women artists
SarahStierch (talk) 22:43, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Controversy over Vogue profile on Asma al-Assad


Hello Aichik. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Controversy over Vogue profile on Asma al-Assad.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 15:03, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

12 Years a Slave GA review
Hi, Aichik. Have you seen my comment on Talk:12 Years a Slave (film)/GA1? The week-long holding period has expired, and this issue needs to be addressed before the article can pass. --1ST7 (talk) 06:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 12 Years a Slave (film)
The article 12 Years a Slave (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:12 Years a Slave (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 1ST7 -- 03:32, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

12 Years a Slave questions & comments
I was reading through the plot summary and noticed two things I thought I'd bring to you: 1) It well exceeds the 700 word limit established by WP:FILMPLOT. The current revision totals 952 words, excluding actor names. That obviously means it needs some trimming. As someone who still hasn't seen the film (unfortunately), I was hoping that you could assist in this. 2) I noticed a particularly weird sentence while reading it:

Eventually the tensions between Tibeats and "Platt" reach a boiling point, when Tibeats attempts to beat Northup and Northup fights back.

This sentence is just oddly structure. Why is Northup referred to as Platt first? He isn't throughout the rest of the summary. Also, if you were to change that to Northup, that would make his name used three times in one sentence, which is just bad writing, to be frank.

Hopefully what I've pointed out is somewhat helpful to you, and I'm glad we've got someone like yourself helping us to improve this already great article. Cheers!  Corvoe  (speak to me)  20:30, 11 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Platt is mentioned in the first sentence of the second paragraph in the plot section, and I've reviewed the article again and see where I can cut 98 words, but getting it down exactly to 700 is impossible, given that this movie is so plot-driven. I appreciate your concern but the WP:FILMPLOT guidelines say "should be between 400 and 700 words" not that it has to be.--Aichik (talk) 22:20, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I feel like you took this super personally for some reason, and it wasn't meant to be negative. I know it's established that he's called Platt, but nowhere else after that, except for the sentence I noted, is he actually referred to as anything other than Northup. It just seems out of place. Also, this is directly from WP:FILMPLOT, the very next sentence after "should be between 400 and 700 words": "The summary should not exceed the range unless the film's structure is unconventional, such as Pulp Fiction's non-linear storyline, or unless the plot is too complicated to summarize in this range. (Discuss with other editors to determine if a summary cannot be contained within the proper range.)" While I see your point, that it may need to be longer than the limit, there hasn't really been a conversation in relation to the length of this section, and one should probably take place. I'm sure someone could find a way to shorten the plot section by a bit.  Corvoe  (speak to me)  16:52, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Not sure why you're writing to me personally, actually (talk about "taking things personally"?): This discussion should be on the film's Talk page. I looked into cutting, but if you can't be talked into a compromise, I'm not going to bother: I'd rather move onto other articles. As you well know you are free to make the changes yourself as you see fit, thanks--Aichik (talk) 17:47, 12 December 2013 (UTC)


 * You were the one who nominated the article for (and more or less got it) GA status. I figured you'd made a lot of good revisions and just wanted to be helpful. I'll be sure not to bug you with it again.  Corvoe  (speak to me)  14:13, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dave Chappelle
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dave Chappelle you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- 14:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Maria Dumlao for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Dumlao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maria Dumlao until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Modification of Breton soccer teams in New York
Hi Aichik, I've seen you updated the article Breton soccer teams in New York last month. This page was heavily modified in August, including deletion of several parts of this article as well as addition of unreferenced information. Is there a means to get back to the pre-August version (which was validated by Wikipedia's administrators) and prevent this page from being massively deleted unlike what happened in August? Thank you for your help, I am relatively new at Wikipedia's. Huelgoat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Erwan huelgoat (talk • contribs) 14:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

PS: the 'vandalism' was done by a user with a user name but its user page does not exist. Thank you for your hints. — signed comment added by Erwan huelgoat (talk • contribs) 20:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

PS2: OK, I will have a look today at what was changed between the vandalisming update and take these change into account in the corrected version. Thank you for your help, it should be alright tonight. — signed comment added by Erwan huelgoat (talk • contribs) 08:14, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Rebecca Chamberlain
Referring to the Rebecca Chamberlain article posting:
 * Hi, so I've added articles from Art in America, the Boston Globe, NY Sun, and the New York Times since you placed your tag about this article needing more references. In addition, I've added a link to articles on the New York Foundation for the Arts, RISD, Pennsylvania Ballet, and a Dutch art nonprofit as well as a dancewear website, the latter for information about her sister. Could you please revert your tag?


 * By the way, according to Wikipedia, you're really only supposed to use the "Refimprove" tag on NON-biographical articles. So I'd encourage you to refrain from using this tag so much, and if you can't, to take a break from Wikipedia for as long as you need. thank you;)

You've done a great job on the Rebecca Chamberlain article and I absolutely agree that there are a number of really great sources, particularly the use of newspaper articles. I reviewed the article and initially took off the Template:BLP sources tag, which defines the usage as:
 * "This template is intended to be placed at the top of articles about living persons that need additional references, and therefore in need of immediate attention. If the article is not about a living or recently deceased subject, you may wish to use instead."

This is a living person, so Sarah applied the correct tag for Biographies of living people.

There are a couple remaining issues, though, that I saw that are best to be resolved before removing the tag. The two biggest ones, and the reason I retagged are: MySpace, not reliable because it's a social media site which has no editorial control, and the artist's CV, which is not a neutral, objective source. The gallery citation would be better to replace with a more reliable secondary source. The source for the daughter is a merchant's site and does not cover the information that was being cited.

Like I said, you've done a great job, just a couple places to tweak and the article will be good. If you cannot find a source for the information at MySpace, the article subject's CV and the merchant site, then it should be removed. I hope this helps, there are a lot of guidelines to sort through. If I can help, let me know.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 02:25, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I've responded on Chamberlain's [talk page]. thanks--Aichik (talk) 19:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dave Chappelle
The article Dave Chappelle you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dave Chappelle for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- 17:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks. Starting to address but will need some more time. Working on other projects at the moment.--Aichik (talk) 23:20, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Women artists
You may be interested in the WikiProject Women artists group. I have been working on saving WikiProject Women artists/Notability concerns.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 21:00, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'll consider it when I have time.--Aichik (talk) 21:26, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

The Guild of Boston Artists
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Guild of Boston Artists, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ''You tagged the article as requiring citations, yet the article was appropriately sourced. See your edit here. ''  CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 05:23, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Farmhouse in Provence
You also tagged Farmhouse in Provence, which may have been a misunderstanding. I moved the placement of the citation to just before the bulleted items which hopefully makes it clearer that the entire list is cited by the same source. The last line had the source info in the sentence, but should have been formatted as a citation. It is now.

If there's just a couple of instances of citations missing, generally citation needed tags are added rather than tagging at the article level. But again, this all was probably a misunderstanding.-- CaroleHenson  ( talk ) 05:33, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Yoko Ono
You tried to put a GA template on Talk:Yoko Ono but it wasn't complete. I'm not familiar with the whole process, but I did not see it nominated on WP:GAC so I removed it. If I was mistaken, please feel free to correct it. Cheers. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:21, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, okay. The brackets weren't complete is what I meant.  I'll re-add it. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I see you already got to it. Again, I wasn't sure what was up so that's why I messaged you. EvergreenFir (talk) 21:27, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yoko Ono
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Yoko Ono you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- 14:40, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi - could you take a look at Talk:Yoko Ono/GA1 when you've got time? There are some serious issues, mostly to do with GA Criteria #2 on verifiability. Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   10:30, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi, I've worked on it some but you keep adding to it. I'll wait until you're completely done. You're also welcome to add some of the edits yourself too. thanks--Aichik (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dave Chappelle
The article Dave Chappelle you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Dave Chappelle for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ChrisGualtieri -- 17:12, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Yoko Ono
The article Yoko Ono you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Yoko Ono for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- 17:32, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Dumlao (February 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. ''' Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! '''
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [.
 * Please remember to link to the submission!

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 12:42, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.


 * Thanks alot! Will attend to this when I can.--Aichik (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Talkback
Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  23:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 16 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * On the Fulton Street (Manhattan) page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=599888486 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F599888486%7CFulton Street (Manhattan)%5D%5D Ask for help])

BMK (talk) 21:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

GOCE March drive wrapup
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Armando Rodriguez
The article I deleted was actually only a redirect, so there's nothing there to send over. If you want to create an article on that name, go for it, won't be overwriting anything. Wizardman 02:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * My admin privileges were removed since I didn't edit for one year, so I can't see the original page. Sorry! Thunderbrand (talk) 22:22, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * I can oblige. There have been three deleted articles at this title.  I'll copy their content below for you - TB (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2014 (UTC)


 * (This deleted 9 October 2005 by User:Thunderbrand) :

Armando Rodriguez 1990-?

Armando Rodriguez is a high school student at Live Oak in California. He is also considered one of the greatest thinkers the school has ever seen. Here are a few of his quotes:

->"School grades are not measurements of how smart (a person) is. It is a measure of how well you grasp a concept. Those that are slower to grasp an idea are usually the ones that thoroughly analyze evry point, thus they will get more out of it."

->"Humans are doomed to fail as a society due to the fact that we do not have enough virtues to counteract our vices. Thus we will never form a perfect utopia." --Aichik (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Thanks all!--Aichik (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
 * (This deleted 19 October 2010 by User:Topbanana) : #REDIRECT Armando Rodríguez-González
 * (This deleted 15 November 2013 by User:Wizardman) : #REDIRECT New York Mets minor league players