User talk:A2326xyz

Schrödinger's cat
Please discuss what you think should be changed in the article on the talk page, before reinserting your changes. If consensus is reached, the article can then be changed. But simply re-inserting into the article what others have removed is counter-productive. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:39, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop edit warring over this change. If you want to change this then it is up to you to explain first and discuss it. It is not the case that your change goes in until others can convince you otherwise. You are already in breach of Wikipedia policy in regards to edit warring and could be blocked. Please revert your changes and discuss them. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Schrödinger's cat. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Three Revert Rule
Please read the Three Revert Rule very carefully before making further edits to Schrödinger's cat. --Old Moonraker (talk) 18:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Schrödinger's cat. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''You have been asked repeatedly to discuss your changes to the article on the talk page, yet have repeatedly re-inserted them without consensus or attempt at discussion. If you put them back in again without having first reached a consensus I will request that you are blocked for disruptive editing.'' Escape Orbit  (Talk) 10:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.