User talk:A4ren3n

Welcome!
Hello, A4ren3n, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Mpc60ii (talk) 01:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Noah Feldman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. This is especially true while dealing with a large amount of content, where you'd usually wanna give adequately cited arguments for deletion on the talk page. Assem Khidhr (talk) 02:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * My apologies! That was an attempt at a constructive, good-faith edit. I was simply trying to remove content that is clearly not befitting an encyclopedic entry. I believe a closer look at my edit would demonstrate that. (talk) 02:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * It's okay. I did take a look at the removed content. While it does need some copyediting to improve wording, it seems to be generally adhereing to WP:VERIFIABLE and WP:NPOV. You can start paraphrasing what you think is unencyclopedic instead of outright deletion. Also, it'd be best if you spread out your objections over multiple edits, such that the benign ones wouldn't be scapegoated for the controversial ones. These latter are better consulted at the talk page first. Thanks. Assem Khidhr (talk) 03:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)