User talk:A6397/Archive 2

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Angelo6397! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 04:28, Sunday, July 19, 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Márquez IV
The article Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Márquez IV you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Márquez IV for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 10:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Márquez IV
Hi Angelo6397. My review on Manny Pacquiao vs. Juan Manuel Márquez IV is now six days old and not much has changed to the article since then. I'm afraid that if no substantial changes are made to the article by tomorrow, I'm going to have to fail it. Thanks. Good888 (talk) 09:20, 17 August 2015 (UT

Maine Mendoza and Yaya Dub
Hello! You have been involved in discussions about the articles Maine Mendoza and Yaya Dub. Please join the conversation here about how to handle these two articles. And please do not make any changes in the current situation until consensus is reached. Thank you. MelanieN (talk) 17:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

I see that the Dotti J Wiki Page. Is there a particular reason why this is happening. We have edited per wiki standards with cites and links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:32FA:2440:6590:20CD:94E4:C850 (talk) 15:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Dotti J AFD
Is there a particular reason for this article's deletion? We created the article, citing references and links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TeamDottiJ (talk • contribs) 15:48, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * @TeamDottiJ It fails ANALYSIS and WP:Notability.– Angelo 6397   T A L K!   13:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Robert T. Carey
I know your intentions were of the best; but state legislators are deemed inherently notable, per WP:POLITICIAN. Believe me, I'm going to flesh out the stub when I have more time; but since I had provided six or seven categories and a stub template, and there are at least two links to this article already, the speedy was inappropriate. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  19:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry for my mistake, hope you understand me. Thanks for letting me know that it is notable. I thought it is not notable because it has no references before. – Angelo 6397   T A L K!   13:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dessert by Dawin.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Dessert by Dawin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. ansh 666 01:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 22 November
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Roy Señeres page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=691894056 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F691894056%7CRoy Señeres%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Roy Señeres at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Rodrigo Duterte presidential campaign, 2016
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Roy Señeres
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Maine Mendoza.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Maine Mendoza.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Karst (talk) 12:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Just as a further note on this, when you add the image it causes a large break up of the info box. When saving, please use the preview feature to check that the image was inserted correctly and has not caused an error on the page. Karst (talk) 13:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Image added and infobox error fixed. Apologies for the confusion and thanks for the clarification. Karst (talk) 15:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Philippine Green Republican Party/meta/shortname listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Philippine Green Republican Party/meta/shortname. Since you had some involvement with the Philippine Green Republican Party/meta/shortname redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Art Dela Cruz


A tag has been placed on Art Dela Cruz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

More of a G8 criteria. Art Dela Cruz is the common name of Arthur dela Cruz's father. But because this page redirects to Arthur dela Cruz, other pages that really link to his father now redirects to him.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Baby miss fortune 02:03, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rodrigo Duterte presidential campaign, 2016
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Rodrigo Duterte presidential campaign, 2016 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Israeltefera12 -- Israeltefera12 (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rodel de Leon


The article Rodel de Leon has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Nothing notable here except he was awarded an MVP plum. However, NAASCU is a minor college sports association in the Philippines (I do not know if NAASCU is even notable). UAAP and NCAA is the two major college tourneys. Also, this player never really played professionally. He was just drafted by a team but did not get into a roster.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Baby miss fortune 10:23, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rodrigo Duterte presidential campaign, 2016
The article Rodrigo Duterte presidential campaign, 2016 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rodrigo Duterte presidential campaign, 2016 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Icebob99 -- Icebob99 (talk) 17:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm ThePlatypusofDoom. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rodrigo Duterte without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 13:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

July 2017
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jordan Clarkson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi Angelo6397. I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 20:42, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Ex Battalion on Tondo Manila, July 29, 2017.png
Thanks for uploading File:Ex Battalion on Tondo Manila, July 29, 2017.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve CongTV
Hi, I'm Slatersteven. Angelo6397, thanks for creating CongTV!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. You need a lot more RS to establish notability. None of these look like are going to pass muster.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Slatersteven (talk) 18:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

You do really need better sources then some of the stuff you are using right now, some of eh look user generated for a start.Slatersteven (talk) 19:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shanti Dope


A tag has been placed on Shanti Dope requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. red dogsix (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of John Roa (musician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Roa (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/John Roa (musician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of CongTV for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CongTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/CongTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:27, 22 August 2018 (UTC)

Angelo Acosta moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Angelo Acosta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Citrivescence (talk) 02:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits to 2019 in Philippine music
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edits to 2019 in Philippine music added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:10, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of O.C. Dawgs


A tag has been placed on O.C. Dawgs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. StaticVapor message me!   20:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Because


A tag has been placed on Because requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. StaticVapor message me!   23:08, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John Roa


A tag has been placed on John Roa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edwardx (talk) 00:03, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Skusta Clee) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Skusta Clee.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 04:09, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Eddie Garcia
I'd like to talk to you regarding some of your edits. Firstly, the word "film" is preferred over "movie" as the latter term is kinda informal to write in this site; I saw a diff in which you had changed "motion picture" to "movie". Don't. Secondly, never cite the IMDb as source of information as it's a user-generated website (like Wikipedia) and thus not a reliable source, as per WP:RS/IMDB. Lastly, how can we know for sure that the photo File:Eddie Garcia, 2019.png really belongs to you? Keep in mind that this site takes copyright violations seriously.  Slightlymad  (talk &sdot; contribs) 03:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)


 * I'll note all of that, that photo belongs to me, I uploaded it on my personal account. -– Angelo  6397   T A L K!   05:56, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Wait a sec. You've had a nice photo of Manoy all along, but you're only uploading this after his death? How come?  Slightlymad  (talk &sdot; contribs) 11:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If you will check on the page revisions, I only started editing his article when the news came out and I'm not really that active in Wikipedia anymore dude. I have job. You can see on my edit counts that I edit a few times in a month only. -– Angelo 6397   T A L K!   11:28, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Could you explain why you removed the fact that Eddie did star in gay roles in this edit? The source does mention this fact.  Slightlymad  (talk &sdot; contribs) 03:00, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Eddie Garcia younger.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Eddie Garcia younger.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:05, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Non free image, not fair use
Why did you add File:Eddie Garcia younger.jpg back into the article, after it was removed as not fair use? Stephen 11:45, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ex Battalion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viva Records ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ex_Battalion check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ex_Battalion?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:43, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antonio Sanchez (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laguna ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Antonio_Sanchez_%28politician%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Antonio_Sanchez_%28politician%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm You've gone incognito. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Carlos Celdran, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!  You've gone incognito  (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dwight Howard, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 20:27, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Re: Edit warring committed by User:Barneysss
Good day!

I dropped by your talk page to seek your help in reporting User:Barneysss as he is engaging in edit warring over several pages. It has come to my attention that you have previously reported the said user for edit warring, that's why I turned to you for help in dealing with him. He justifies his actions by saying his reversion of my, and others' edits be they extended confirmed users or anonymous editors are in accord with the rules of Wikipedia, but it appears he doesn't have a clear grasp of the said rules. What he does is impose his will on the said pages to make sure that his edit becomes the definitive version of any given page that he so choose to watch. Because of his edit warring, it could be said that he is likewise a disruptive editor. It has also been observed by other editors that his reversion of edits are unconstructive. That's why I am imploring your aid protecting said pages from Barneysss' disruptive and unconstructive editing which he continues to impose even if there has formed an implied consensus among the editors in the pages he watches. The fact that he does not agree with that implied consensus does not give him the license to impose his will and revert mine and several other editor's edits.

Warmest regards.

Gardo Versace (talk) 16:42, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Unconstructive Edits
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ex Battalion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mark Maglasang (talk) 08:12, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello, I don't see any disruptive about the edit I made, I removed their real names in the member list because the information is not needed. I've been editing Wikipedia for a decade now. -– A 6397   T A L K!   08:51, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Do you even know Ex Battalion? How sure are you that such information isn’t needed? For your information, I’m the leader of Ex Battalion, I am Mark “Bosx1ne” Maglasang. This is my official wikipedia account. If you haven’t known, I am more adept with the group itself. Respect any of my edits in the group page for Ex Battalion. It’s like you’re invalidating what I’ve contributed through always revising it to what was wrong. Please refrain from doing so. Good day.🙂 Mark Maglasang (talk) 14:24, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I wrote the article. I repeat, I am well-aware of Wikipedia's policies about vandalisms. And my edit isn't disruptive at all. I won't buy that you are actually Bosx1ne himself, I checked your edit history and how come would he spend time editing other articles like Janella Salvador, and a Legazpi Airport. -– A 6397   T A L K!

Why do you care if I edit other pages? And what about you? You edit other pages, right? So don’t even accuse me that I am impersonating other people just because I edit other pages. Who are you anyway? Get a life.🙃 Mark Maglasang (talk) 08:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ex Battalion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viva Records ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ex_Battalion check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ex_Battalion?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Ex Battalion on Tondo Manila, July 29, 2017.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ex Battalion on Tondo Manila, July 29, 2017.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)